From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CF5C433E0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 17:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2BA20708 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 17:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729238AbgESRfM (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 13:35:12 -0400 Received: from correo.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:55020 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729001AbgESRfM (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 13:35:12 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9367EE16F2 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:35:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A76DA70E for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:35:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix, from userid 99) id 72D09DA72A; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:35:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82761DA70E; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:35:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.97 (192.168.1.97) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int); Tue, 19 May 2020 19:35:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int) Received: from us.es (unknown [90.77.255.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 1984lsi) by entrada.int (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DFDC42EF9E1; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:35:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 19:35:08 +0200 X-SMTPAUTHUS: auth mail.us.es From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Edward Cree Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, jiri@resnulli.us, kuba@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: flow_offload: simplify hw stats check handling Message-ID: <20200519173508.GA17141@salvia> References: <20200519171923.GA16785@salvia> <6013b7ce-48c9-7169-c945-01b2226638e4@solarflare.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <6013b7ce-48c9-7169-c945-01b2226638e4@solarflare.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 06:23:35PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote: > On 19/05/2020 18:19, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > This is breaking netfilter again. > > Still waiting for you to explain what this "breaks".  AFAICT the > new DONT_CARE has exactly the same effect that the old DONT_CARE > did, so as long as netfilter is using DONT_CARE rather than (say) > a hard-coded 0, it should be fine. Did you test your patch with netfilter? I don't think. Netfilter is a client of this flow offload API, you have to test that your core updates do not break any of existing clients. Please, do not make me think this is intentional. I am pretty sure your motivation is to help get things better.