From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131FAC433E2 for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE672070A for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 09:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728930AbgEUJIT (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2020 05:08:19 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:53789 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728702AbgEUJIS (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2020 05:08:18 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B08C668BEB; Thu, 21 May 2020 11:08:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 11:08:12 +0200 From: 'Christoph Hellwig' To: David Laight Cc: 'Christoph Hellwig' , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , David Miller , "kuba@kernel.org" , "edumazet@google.com" , "kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru" , "yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org" , "vyasevich@gmail.com" , "nhorman@tuxdriver.com" , "jmaloy@redhat.com" , "ying.xue@windriver.com" , "drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "target-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-afs@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org" , "cluster-devel@redhat.com" , "ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "rds-devel@oss.oracle.com" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/33] sctp: add sctp_sock_set_nodelay Message-ID: <20200521090812.GA8330@lst.de> References: <20200520195509.2215098-1-hch@lst.de> <20200520195509.2215098-32-hch@lst.de> <20200520231001.GU2491@localhost.localdomain> <20200520.162355.2212209708127373208.davem@davemloft.net> <20200520233913.GV2491@localhost.localdomain> <20200521083442.GA7771@lst.de> <0a6839ab0ba04fcf9b9c92784c9564aa@AcuMS.aculab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0a6839ab0ba04fcf9b9c92784c9564aa@AcuMS.aculab.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:06:19AM +0000, David Laight wrote: > > > The comment still applies, though. (re the duplication) > > > > Where do you see duplication? > > The whole thing just doesn't scale. > > As soon as you get to the slightly more complex requests > like SCTP_INITMSG (which should probably be called to > set the required number of data streams) you've either > got replicated code or nested wrappers. None of that is relevant to setting the nodelay option. If you actually read through the series you'd say that whenever there was non-trivial logic it is shared with getopt. However sharing just for purpose of sharing doesn't make sense, so where the kernel API ended up just setting a flag after taking the sock lock I did not opt for it.