From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/7] Clause 45 PHY probing cleanups
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 15:29:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526142948.GY1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
Hi,
In response to the patch set that Jeremy posted, this is my proposal
to expand our Clause 45 PHY probing.
I've taken a slightly different approach, with the view to avoiding
as much behavioural change as possible. The biggest difference is
to do with "devices_in_package" - we were using it for two different
purposes, which are now separated.
This is not against net-next nor net trees, but against my own private
tree, but I'm posting it to serve as an illustration of what I think
should be done - I knocked this up this morning.
The only potential regression that I'm expecting is with 88x3310 PHYs
of the later revision, which have the clause 22 registers implemented.
I haven't yet checked whether they set bit 0, but if they do, the
various decision points that we have based on that bit could adversely
affect this PHY - it needs testing, which I'll do when I dig out the
appropriate hardware. Probably also needs the 2110 PHYs checked as
well.
I haven't tested this series yet beyond compile testing.
Given the proximity of the merge window, this *isn't* code I'd like to
see merged into net-next - it's way too risky at this point. So, we
have time to consider our options.
drivers/net/phy/bcm87xx.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/phy/cortina.c | 3 +-
drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c | 4 +-
drivers/net/phy/phy-core.c | 11 ++--
drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 4 +-
drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 19 +++---
include/linux/mdio.h | 31 ++++++++++
include/linux/phy.h | 14 ++---
9 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC for 0.8m (est. 1762m) line in suburbia: sync at 13.1Mbps down 424kbps up
next reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-26 14:29 Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] net: mdiobus: add clause 45 mdiobus accessors Russell King
2020-05-26 14:39 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-26 15:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] net: phy: clean up cortina workaround Russell King
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] net: phy: clean up PHY ID reading Russell King
2020-05-26 15:38 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-26 15:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] net: phy: add support for probing MMDs >= 8 for devices-in-package Russell King
2020-05-26 17:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 17:20 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-26 17:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] net: phy: set devices_in_package only after validation Russell King
2020-05-26 15:39 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-26 15:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 16:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] net: phy: split devices_in_package Russell King
2020-05-26 15:39 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-26 15:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 16:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] net: phy: read MMD ID from all present MMDs Russell King
2020-05-26 15:35 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-26 15:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 15:43 ` [PATCH RFC 0/7] Clause 45 PHY probing cleanups Russell King - ARM Linux admin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200526142948.GY1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).