netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 6/7] net: phy: split devices_in_package
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 17:00:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526160004.GD1605@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200526154754.GE1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 04:47:54PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:39:08AM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 5/26/20 9:31 AM, Russell King wrote:
> > > We have two competing requirements for the devices_in_package field.
> > > We want to use it as a bit array indicating which MMDs are present, but
> > > we also want to know if the Clause 22 registers are present.
> > > 
> > > Since "devices in package" is a term used in the 802.3 specification,
> > > keep this as the as-specified values read from the PHY, and introduce
> > > a new member "mmds_present" to indicate which MMDs are actually
> > > present in the PHY, derived from the "devices in package" value.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c    | 4 ++--
> > >   drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 6 +++---
> > >   drivers/net/phy/phylink.c    | 8 ++++----
> > >   include/linux/phy.h          | 4 +++-
> > >   4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
> > > index 8cd952950a75..4b5805e2bd0e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
> > > @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ int genphy_c45_read_link(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > >   	int val, devad;
> > >   	bool link = true;
> > > -	if (phydev->c45_ids.devices_in_package & MDIO_DEVS_AN) {
> > > +	if (phydev->c45_ids.mmds_present & MDIO_DEVS_AN) {
> > >   		val = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_AN, MDIO_CTRL1);
> > >   		if (val < 0)
> > >   			return val;
> > > @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ int genphy_c45_pma_read_abilities(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > >   	int val;
> > >   	linkmode_clear_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Autoneg_BIT, phydev->supported);
> > > -	if (phydev->c45_ids.devices_in_package & MDIO_DEVS_AN) {
> > > +	if (phydev->c45_ids.mmds_present & MDIO_DEVS_AN) {
> > >   		val = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_AN, MDIO_STAT1);
> > >   		if (val < 0)
> > >   			return val;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > > index a483d79cfc87..1c948bbf4fa0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > > @@ -707,9 +707,6 @@ static int get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, int dev_addr,
> > >   		return -EIO;
> > >   	*devices_in_package |= phy_reg;
> > > -	/* Bit 0 doesn't represent a device, it indicates c22 regs presence */
> > > -	*devices_in_package &= ~BIT(0);
> > > -
> > >   	return 0;
> > >   }
> > > @@ -788,6 +785,8 @@ static int get_phy_c45_ids(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, u32 *phy_id,
> > >   	}
> > >   	c45_ids->devices_in_package = devs_in_pkg;
> > > +	/* Bit 0 doesn't represent a device, it indicates c22 regs presence */
> > > +	c45_ids->mmds_present = devs_in_pkg & ~BIT(0);
> > >   	*phy_id = 0;
> > >   	return 0;
> > > @@ -842,6 +841,7 @@ struct phy_device *get_phy_device(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, bool is_c45)
> > >   	int r;
> > >   	c45_ids.devices_in_package = 0;
> > > +	c45_ids.mmds_present = 0;
> > >   	memset(c45_ids.device_ids, 0xff, sizeof(c45_ids.device_ids));
> > >   	if (is_c45)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> > > index 6defd5eddd58..b548e0418694 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> > > @@ -1709,11 +1709,11 @@ static int phylink_phy_read(struct phylink *pl, unsigned int phy_id,
> > >   		case MII_BMSR:
> > >   		case MII_PHYSID1:
> > >   		case MII_PHYSID2:
> > > -			devad = __ffs(phydev->c45_ids.devices_in_package);
> > > +			devad = __ffs(phydev->c45_ids.mmds_present);
> > >   			break;
> > >   		case MII_ADVERTISE:
> > >   		case MII_LPA:
> > > -			if (!(phydev->c45_ids.devices_in_package & MDIO_DEVS_AN))
> > > +			if (!(phydev->c45_ids.mmds_present & MDIO_DEVS_AN))
> > >   				return -EINVAL;
> > >   			devad = MDIO_MMD_AN;
> > >   			if (reg == MII_ADVERTISE)
> > > @@ -1749,11 +1749,11 @@ static int phylink_phy_write(struct phylink *pl, unsigned int phy_id,
> > >   		case MII_BMSR:
> > >   		case MII_PHYSID1:
> > >   		case MII_PHYSID2:
> > > -			devad = __ffs(phydev->c45_ids.devices_in_package);
> > > +			devad = __ffs(phydev->c45_ids.mmds_present);
> > >   			break;
> > >   		case MII_ADVERTISE:
> > >   		case MII_LPA:
> > > -			if (!(phydev->c45_ids.devices_in_package & MDIO_DEVS_AN))
> > > +			if (!(phydev->c45_ids.mmds_present & MDIO_DEVS_AN))
> > >   				return -EINVAL;
> > >   			devad = MDIO_MMD_AN;
> > >   			if (reg == MII_ADVERTISE)
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/phy.h b/include/linux/phy.h
> > > index 41c046545354..0d41c710339a 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/phy.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/phy.h
> > > @@ -354,11 +354,13 @@ enum phy_state {
> > >   /**
> > >    * struct phy_c45_device_ids - 802.3-c45 Device Identifiers
> > > - * @devices_in_package: Bit vector of devices present.
> > > + * @devices_in_package: IEEE 802.3 devices in package register value.
> > > + * @mmds_present: bit vector of MMDs present.
> > >    * @device_ids: The device identifer for each present device.
> > >    */
> > >   struct phy_c45_device_ids {
> > >   	u32 devices_in_package;
> > > +	u32 mmds_present;
> > >   	u32 device_ids[8];
> > >   };
> > 
> > It seems like the majority of the devices_in_package accessors are just bit
> > masking for a given MMD/field. The case that has the problem is the __ffs()
> > calls which failed to account for this. So why not just fix those two cases
> > instead of creating a duplicate field with exactly the same data in it minus
> > a bit.
> 
> I think I explained that in the commit message...

I should also point out that we may wish to clear bits in mmds_present
when we scan the IDs and discover STAT2 registers that indicate that
the MMD is not implemented, while leaving the devices_in_package
field unaltered.

To do that would be a behavioural change, which is something that
this series is trying to avoid.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC for 0.8m (est. 1762m) line in suburbia: sync at 13.1Mbps down 424kbps up

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-26 14:29 [PATCH RFC 0/7] Clause 45 PHY probing cleanups Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] net: mdiobus: add clause 45 mdiobus accessors Russell King
2020-05-26 14:39   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-26 15:21     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] net: phy: clean up cortina workaround Russell King
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] net: phy: clean up PHY ID reading Russell King
2020-05-26 15:38   ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-26 15:46     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] net: phy: add support for probing MMDs >= 8 for devices-in-package Russell King
2020-05-26 17:14   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 17:20     ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-26 17:53       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] net: phy: set devices_in_package only after validation Russell King
2020-05-26 15:39   ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-26 15:50     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 16:33       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] net: phy: split devices_in_package Russell King
2020-05-26 15:39   ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-26 15:47     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 16:00       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-05-26 14:31 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] net: phy: read MMD ID from all present MMDs Russell King
2020-05-26 15:35   ` Jeremy Linton
2020-05-26 15:46     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-26 15:43 ` [PATCH RFC 0/7] Clause 45 PHY probing cleanups Russell King - ARM Linux admin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200526160004.GD1605@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).