netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mvpp2: Enable autoneg bypass for 1000BaseX/2500BaseX ports
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 14:56:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200528135608.GU1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200528151733.f1bc2fcdcb312b19b2919be9@suse.de>

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 03:17:33PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2020 14:07:38 +0100
> Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 02:11:21PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > > Commit d14e078f23cc ("net: marvell: mvpp2: only reprogram what is necessary
> > >  on mac_config") disabled auto negotiation bypass completely, which breaks
> > > platforms enabling bypass via firmware (not the best option, but it worked).
> > > Since 1000BaseX/2500BaseX ports neither negotiate speed nor duplex mode
> > > we could enable auto negotiation bypass to get back information about link
> > > state.
> > 
> > Thanks, but your commit is missing some useful information.
> > 
> > Which platforms have broken?
> 
> it's an Ambedded MARS-400
>  
> > Can you describe the situation where you require this bit to be set?
> 
> as I have no exact design details I'm just talking about what I can see
> on that platform. It looks like the switch connecting the internal nodes
> doesn't run autoneg on the internal links. So the link to the internal
> nodes will never come up. These links are running 2500BaseX so speed/duplex
> is clean and by enabling bypass I'll get a proper link state, too.
> 
> > We should not be enabling bypass mode as a matter of course, it exists
> > to work around broken setups which do not send the control word.
> 
> if you call it a broken setup I'm fine, but this doesn't solve the problem,
> which exists now. What would be your solution ?

What I was after was additional information about the problem, so
that we can start thinking about how to deal with the AN bypass bit
in a sensible way.

How is the connection between the switch and network interface
described?  I don't think I see a .dts file in mainline for this
platform.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC for 0.8m (est. 1762m) line in suburbia: sync at 13.1Mbps down 424kbps up

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-28 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-28 12:11 [PATCH net] net: mvpp2: Enable autoneg bypass for 1000BaseX/2500BaseX ports Thomas Bogendoerfer
2020-05-28 13:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-28 13:17   ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2020-05-28 13:56     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-05-28 14:33       ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2020-05-28 14:48         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-28 18:43           ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2020-05-28 20:15             ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-28 22:04             ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-29 11:05               ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2020-05-29 14:59                 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-29 15:51                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-29 16:25                     ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-29 17:02                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-29 15:52                   ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2020-05-29 16:33                     ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-02  8:08                       ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2020-06-02 22:50                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-03 12:31                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-03 13:21                         ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-03 14:58                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-28 16:33         ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-28 18:43           ` Thomas Bogendoerfer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200528135608.GU1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tbogendoerfer@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).