From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 02/15] xfrm: do pskb_pull properly in __xfrm_transport_prep
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:03:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200529110408.6349-3-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529110408.6349-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
For transport mode, when ipv6 nexthdr is set, the packet format might
be like:
----------------------------------------------------
| | dest | | | | ESP | ESP |
| IP6 hdr| opts.| ESP | TCP | Data | Trailer | ICV |
----------------------------------------------------
and in __xfrm_transport_prep():
pskb_pull(skb, skb->mac_len + sizeof(ip6hdr) + x->props.header_len);
it will pull the data pointer to the wrong position, as it missed the
nexthdrs/dest opts.
This patch is to fix it by using:
pskb_pull(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb) + x->props.header_len);
as we can be sure transport_header points to ESP header at that moment.
It also fixes a panic when packets with ipv6 nexthdr are sent over
esp6 transport mode:
[ 100.473845] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4325!
[ 100.478517] RIP: 0010:__skb_to_sgvec+0x252/0x260
[ 100.494355] Call Trace:
[ 100.494829] skb_to_sgvec+0x11/0x40
[ 100.495492] esp6_output_tail+0x12e/0x550 [esp6]
[ 100.496358] esp6_xmit+0x1d5/0x260 [esp6_offload]
[ 100.498029] validate_xmit_xfrm+0x22f/0x2e0
[ 100.499604] __dev_queue_xmit+0x589/0x910
[ 100.502928] ip6_finish_output2+0x2a5/0x5a0
[ 100.503718] ip6_output+0x6c/0x120
[ 100.505198] xfrm_output_resume+0x4bf/0x530
[ 100.508683] xfrm6_output+0x3a/0xc0
[ 100.513446] inet6_csk_xmit+0xa1/0xf0
[ 100.517335] tcp_sendmsg+0x27/0x40
[ 100.517977] sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x60
[ 100.518648] __sys_sendto+0xee/0x160
Fixes: c35fe4106b92 ("xfrm: Add mode handlers for IPsec on layer 2")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
index 6cc7f7f1dd68..f50d1f97cf8e 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
@@ -25,12 +25,10 @@ static void __xfrm_transport_prep(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct xfrm_offload *xo = xfrm_offload(skb);
skb_reset_mac_len(skb);
- pskb_pull(skb, skb->mac_len + hsize + x->props.header_len);
-
- if (xo->flags & XFRM_GSO_SEGMENT) {
- skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
+ if (xo->flags & XFRM_GSO_SEGMENT)
skb->transport_header -= x->props.header_len;
- }
+
+ pskb_pull(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb) + x->props.header_len);
}
static void __xfrm_mode_tunnel_prep(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb,
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 11:03 pull request (net): ipsec 2020-05-29 Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:03 ` [PATCH 01/15] xfrm: allow to accept packets with ipv6 NEXTHDR_HOP in xfrm_input Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:03 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
2020-05-29 11:03 ` [PATCH 03/15] esp6: get the right proto for transport mode in esp6_gso_encap Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:03 ` [PATCH 04/15] xfrm: remove the xfrm_state_put call becofe going to out_reset Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:03 ` [PATCH 05/15] xfrm: fix error in comment Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:03 ` [PATCH 06/15] xfrm: espintcp: save and call old ->sk_destruct Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 07/15] esp6: support ipv6 nexthdrs process for beet gso segment Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 08/15] esp4: " Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 09/15] xfrm: call xfrm_output_gso when inner_protocol is set in xfrm_output Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 10/15] ip_vti: receive ipip packet by calling ip_tunnel_rcv Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 11/15] xfrm interface: fix oops when deleting a x-netns interface Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 12/15] esp6: calculate transport_header correctly when sel.family != AF_INET6 Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 13/15] esp4: improve xfrm4_beet_gso_segment() to be more readable Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 14/15] xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 11:04 ` [PATCH 15/15] xfrm: fix a NULL-ptr deref in xfrm_local_error Steffen Klassert
2020-05-29 20:06 ` pull request (net): ipsec 2020-05-29 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200529110408.6349-3-steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).