From: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
To: <asmadeus@codewreck.org>, <ericvh@gmail.com>, <lucho@ionkov.net>,
<davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <wanghai38@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] 9p/trans_fd: Fix concurrency del of req_list in p9_fd_cancelled/p9_read_work
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:08:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200612090833.36149-1-wanghai38@huawei.com> (raw)
p9_read_work and p9_fd_cancelled may be called concurrently.
In some cases, req->req_list may be deleted by both p9_read_work
and p9_fd_cancelled.
We can fix it by ignoring replies associated with a cancelled
request and ignoring cancelled request if message has been received
before lock.
Fixes: 60ff779c4abb ("9p: client: remove unused code and any reference to "cancelled" function")
Reported-by: syzbot+77a25acfa0382e06ab23@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
---
v1->v2:
1. Add ignoring replies associated with a cancelled request.
2. Improved some descriptions suggested by Dominique.
net/9p/trans_fd.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
index 13cd683a658a..3f67803123be 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
@@ -362,6 +362,10 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (m->rreq->status == REQ_STATUS_SENT) {
list_del(&m->rreq->req_list);
p9_client_cb(m->client, m->rreq, REQ_STATUS_RCVD);
+ } else if (m->rreq->status == REQ_STATUS_FLSHD) {
+ /* Ignore replies associated with a cancelled request. */
+ p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_TRANS,
+ "Ignore replies associated with a cancelled request\n");
} else {
spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR,
@@ -703,11 +707,20 @@ static int p9_fd_cancelled(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
{
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_TRANS, "client %p req %p\n", client, req);
+ spin_lock(&client->lock);
+ /* Ignore cancelled request if message has been received
+ * before lock.
+ */
+ if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_RCVD) {
+ spin_unlock(&client->lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
/* we haven't received a response for oldreq,
* remove it from the list.
*/
- spin_lock(&client->lock);
list_del(&req->req_list);
+ req->status = REQ_STATUS_FLSHD;
spin_unlock(&client->lock);
p9_req_put(req);
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-12 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-12 9:08 Wang Hai [this message]
2020-06-12 9:10 ` [PATCH v2] 9p/trans_fd: Fix concurrency del of req_list in p9_fd_cancelled/p9_read_work Dominique Martinet
2020-06-12 9:22 ` wanghai (M)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200612090833.36149-1-wanghai38@huawei.com \
--to=wanghai38@huawei.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).