From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: macb: reject unsupported rgmii delays
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:40:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617114025.GQ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200617112153.GB28783@laureti-dev>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:21:53PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:55:18PM +0200, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > The individual RGMII delay modes are more about what the PHY itself is
> > asked to do with respect to inserting delays, so I don't think your
> > patch makes sense.
>
> This seems to be the same aspect that Vladimir Oltean remarked. I agree
> that the relevant hunk should be dropped.
>
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
> > > @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static void macb_validate(struct phylink_config *config,
> > > state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII &&
> > > state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_GMII &&
> > > state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII &&
> > > - !phy_interface_mode_is_rgmii(state->interface)) {
> > > + state->interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID) {
> >
> > Here you reject everything except PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID.
> >
> > > bitmap_zero(supported, __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS);
> > > return;
> > > }
> > > @@ -694,6 +694,13 @@ static int macb_phylink_connect(struct macb *bp)
> > > struct phy_device *phydev;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > + if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(dn) &&
> > > + phy_interface_mode_is_rgmii(bp->phy_interface) &&
> > > + bp->phy_interface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII) {
> >
> > but here you reject everything except PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII. These
> > can't both be right. If you start with PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII, and
> > have a fixed link, you'll have PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII passed into
> > the validate function, which will then fail.
>
> For a fixed-link, the validation function is never called. Therefore, it
> cannot reject PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII. It works in practice.
Hmm, I'm not so sure, but then I don't know exactly what code you're
using. Looking at mainline, even for a fixed link, you call
phylink_create(). phylink_create() will spot the fixed link, and
parse the description, calling the validation function. If that
fails, it will generate a warning at that point:
"fixed link %s duplex %dMbps not recognised"
It doesn't cause an operational failure, but it means that you end up
with a zero supported mask, which is likely not expected.
This is not an expected situation, so I'll modify your claim to "it
works but issues a warning" which still means that it's not correct.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-17 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-16 7:49 [PATCH] net: macb: reject unsupported rgmii delays Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17 9:24 ` Nicolas Ferre
2020-06-17 9:57 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-17 11:15 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-17 11:21 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17 11:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-06-17 11:52 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17 12:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 8:14 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-18 8:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 9:05 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-18 10:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 18:26 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-18 18:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-18 18:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 19:02 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-18 19:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-17 11:32 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-17 11:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-17 11:38 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-17 11:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 18:25 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200617114025.GQ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=helmut.grohne@intenta.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).