netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: macb: reject unsupported rgmii delays
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:08:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617120809.GS1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200617115201.GA30172@laureti-dev>

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:52:01PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:40:25PM +0200, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > > For a fixed-link, the validation function is never called. Therefore, it
> > > cannot reject PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII. It works in practice.
> > 
> > Hmm, I'm not so sure, but then I don't know exactly what code you're
> > using.  Looking at mainline, even for a fixed link, you call
> > phylink_create().  phylink_create() will spot the fixed link, and
> > parse the description, calling the validation function.  If that
> > fails, it will generate a warning at that point:
> > 
> >   "fixed link %s duplex %dMbps not recognised"
> > 
> > It doesn't cause an operational failure, but it means that you end up
> > with a zero supported mask, which is likely not expected.
> > 
> > This is not an expected situation, so I'll modify your claim to "it
> > works but issues a warning" which still means that it's not correct.
> 
> I do see that warning. I agree with your correction of my claim. Thank
> you for your attention to detail.
> 
> So we have two good reasons for not rejecting delay configuration in the
> validation function now.
> 
> The remaining open question seems to be whether configuring a delay on a
> MAC to MAC connection should cause a failure or a only warning. Do you
> have an opinion on that?
> 
> All in-tree bindings of the driver seem to use rmii when they specify a
> phy-mode.

This brings up a problem in itself - the phy interface mode is
currently defined in terms of a MAC-to-PHY setup, not a MAC-to-MAC
setup.

With a fixed link, we could be in either a MAC-to-PHY or MAC-to-MAC
setup; we just don't know.  However, we don't have is access to the
PHY (if it exists) in the fixed link case to configure it for the
delay.

In the MAC-to-MAC RGMII setup, where neither MAC can insert the
necessary delay, the only way to have a RGMII conformant link is to
have the PCB traces induce the necessary delay. That errs towards
PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII for this case.

However, considering the MAC-to-PHY RGMII fixed link case, where the
PHY may not be accessible, and may be configured with the necessary
delay, should that case also use PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII - clearly
that would be as wrong as using PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID would
be for the MAC-to-MAC RGMII with PCB-delays case.

So, I think a MAC driver should not care about the specific RGMII
mode being asked for in any case, and just accept them all.

I also think that some of this ought to be put in the documentation
as guidance for new implementations.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-17 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-16  7:49 [PATCH] net: macb: reject unsupported rgmii delays Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17  9:24 ` Nicolas Ferre
2020-06-17  9:57 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-17 11:15   ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-17 11:21   ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17 11:40     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-17 11:52       ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17 12:08         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-06-18  8:14           ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-18  8:45             ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18  9:05               ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-18 10:01                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 18:26                   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-18 18:06               ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-18 18:49                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 19:02                   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-18 19:10                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-17 11:32   ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-17 11:34     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-17 11:38       ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-17 11:57         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 18:25           ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200617120809.GS1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=helmut.grohne@intenta.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).