From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: macb: reject unsupported rgmii delays
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:08:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617120809.GS1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200617115201.GA30172@laureti-dev>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:52:01PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:40:25PM +0200, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > > For a fixed-link, the validation function is never called. Therefore, it
> > > cannot reject PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII. It works in practice.
> >
> > Hmm, I'm not so sure, but then I don't know exactly what code you're
> > using. Looking at mainline, even for a fixed link, you call
> > phylink_create(). phylink_create() will spot the fixed link, and
> > parse the description, calling the validation function. If that
> > fails, it will generate a warning at that point:
> >
> > "fixed link %s duplex %dMbps not recognised"
> >
> > It doesn't cause an operational failure, but it means that you end up
> > with a zero supported mask, which is likely not expected.
> >
> > This is not an expected situation, so I'll modify your claim to "it
> > works but issues a warning" which still means that it's not correct.
>
> I do see that warning. I agree with your correction of my claim. Thank
> you for your attention to detail.
>
> So we have two good reasons for not rejecting delay configuration in the
> validation function now.
>
> The remaining open question seems to be whether configuring a delay on a
> MAC to MAC connection should cause a failure or a only warning. Do you
> have an opinion on that?
>
> All in-tree bindings of the driver seem to use rmii when they specify a
> phy-mode.
This brings up a problem in itself - the phy interface mode is
currently defined in terms of a MAC-to-PHY setup, not a MAC-to-MAC
setup.
With a fixed link, we could be in either a MAC-to-PHY or MAC-to-MAC
setup; we just don't know. However, we don't have is access to the
PHY (if it exists) in the fixed link case to configure it for the
delay.
In the MAC-to-MAC RGMII setup, where neither MAC can insert the
necessary delay, the only way to have a RGMII conformant link is to
have the PCB traces induce the necessary delay. That errs towards
PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII for this case.
However, considering the MAC-to-PHY RGMII fixed link case, where the
PHY may not be accessible, and may be configured with the necessary
delay, should that case also use PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII - clearly
that would be as wrong as using PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID would
be for the MAC-to-MAC RGMII with PCB-delays case.
So, I think a MAC driver should not care about the specific RGMII
mode being asked for in any case, and just accept them all.
I also think that some of this ought to be put in the documentation
as guidance for new implementations.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-17 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-16 7:49 [PATCH] net: macb: reject unsupported rgmii delays Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17 9:24 ` Nicolas Ferre
2020-06-17 9:57 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-17 11:15 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-17 11:21 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17 11:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-17 11:52 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17 12:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-06-18 8:14 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-18 8:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 9:05 ` Helmut Grohne
2020-06-18 10:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 18:26 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-18 18:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-18 18:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 19:02 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-18 19:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-17 11:32 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-17 11:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-17 11:38 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-17 11:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 18:25 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200617120809.GS1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=helmut.grohne@intenta.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).