netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>,
	Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>,
	Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] s390/qeth: fix error handling for isolation mode cmds
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:54:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617145453.61382-2-jwi@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200617145453.61382-1-jwi@linux.ibm.com>

Current(?) OSA devices also store their cmd-specific return codes for
SET_ACCESS_CONTROL cmds into the top-level cmd->hdr.return_code.
So once we added stricter checking for the top-level field a while ago,
none of the error logic that rolls back the user's configuration to its
old state is applied any longer.

For this specific cmd, go back to the old model where we peek into the
cmd structure even though the top-level field indicated an error.

Fixes: 686c97ee29c8 ("s390/qeth: fix error handling in adapter command callbacks")
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
index 18a0fb75a710..9636415f810b 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -4544,9 +4544,6 @@ static int qeth_setadpparms_set_access_ctrl_cb(struct qeth_card *card,
 	int fallback = *(int *)reply->param;
 
 	QETH_CARD_TEXT(card, 4, "setaccb");
-	if (cmd->hdr.return_code)
-		return -EIO;
-	qeth_setadpparms_inspect_rc(cmd);
 
 	access_ctrl_req = &cmd->data.setadapterparms.data.set_access_ctrl;
 	QETH_CARD_TEXT_(card, 2, "rc=%d",
@@ -4556,7 +4553,7 @@ static int qeth_setadpparms_set_access_ctrl_cb(struct qeth_card *card,
 		QETH_DBF_MESSAGE(3, "ERR:SET_ACCESS_CTRL(%#x) on device %x: %#x\n",
 				 access_ctrl_req->subcmd_code, CARD_DEVID(card),
 				 cmd->data.setadapterparms.hdr.return_code);
-	switch (cmd->data.setadapterparms.hdr.return_code) {
+	switch (qeth_setadpparms_inspect_rc(cmd)) {
 	case SET_ACCESS_CTRL_RC_SUCCESS:
 		if (card->options.isolation == ISOLATION_MODE_NONE) {
 			dev_info(&card->gdev->dev,
-- 
2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-17 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-17 14:54 [PATCH net 0/2] s390/qeth: fixes 2020-06-17 Julian Wiedmann
2020-06-17 14:54 ` Julian Wiedmann [this message]
2020-06-17 14:54 ` [PATCH net 2/2] s390/qeth: let isolation mode override HW offload restrictions Julian Wiedmann
2020-06-19  3:27 ` [PATCH net 0/2] s390/qeth: fixes 2020-06-17 David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200617145453.61382-2-jwi@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=jwi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).