From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com,
alexandru.marginean@nxp.com, michael@walle.cc,
f.fainelli@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: phy: add Lynx PCS MDIO module
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 23:27:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618222727.GM1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200618221352.GB279339@lunn.ch>
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:13:52AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> > drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 6 +
> > drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/net/phy/mdio-lynx-pcs.c | 358 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/mdio-lynx-pcs.h | 43 ++++
> > 5 files changed, 415 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/net/phy/mdio-lynx-pcs.c
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/mdio-lynx-pcs.h
>
> Hi Ioana
>
> We should think about naming convention here.
>
> All MDIO bus driver, MDIO multiplexors etc use mdio- as a prefix.
>
> This is not a bus driver, so i don't think it should use the mdio-
> prefix. How about pcs-lynx.c?
>
> In terms of Kconfig, MDIO_ prefix is used for MDIO bus drivers etc. I
> don't think it is appropriate here. How about PCS_LYNX? I don't think
> any other subsystem is using PCS_ as a prefix.
>
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> > @@ -235,6 +235,12 @@ config MDIO_XPCS
> > This module provides helper functions for Synopsys DesignWare XPCS
> > controllers.
> >
> > +config MDIO_LYNX_PCS
> > + bool
> > + help
> > + This module provides helper functions for Lynx PCS enablement
> > + representing the PCS as an MDIO device.
> > +
> > endif
> > endif
>
> Maybe add this at the end, and add a
>
> comment "PCS device drivers"
>
> before it? I'm assuming with time we will have more of these drivers.
It think we will.
The other thing is, drivers/net/phy is becoming a little cluttered -
we have approaching 100 files there.
Should we be thinking about drivers/net/phy/mdio/ (for mdio*),
drivers/net/phy/lib/ for the core phylib code or leaving it where
it is, and, hmm, drivers/net/phy/media/ maybe for the PHY and PCS
drivers? Or something like that?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-18 12:08 [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: phy: add Lynx PCS MDIO module Ioana Ciornei
2020-06-18 12:08 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: phylink: add interface to configure clause 22 PCS PHY Ioana Ciornei
2020-06-18 12:08 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: phylink: consider QSGMII interface mode in phylink_mii_c22_pcs_get_state Ioana Ciornei
2020-06-18 12:08 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: mdiobus: add clause 45 mdiobus write accessor Ioana Ciornei
2020-06-18 12:08 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: phy: add Lynx PCS MDIO module Ioana Ciornei
2020-06-18 14:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 16:17 ` Ioana Ciornei
2020-06-18 16:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 17:34 ` Ioana Ciornei
2020-06-18 22:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 22:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-18 22:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 22:56 ` Ioana Ciornei
2020-06-18 15:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-06-18 22:13 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-18 22:25 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-18 22:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-06-18 22:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-18 22:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-18 12:08 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: dsa: felix: use the Lynx PCS helpers Ioana Ciornei
2020-06-18 15:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-06-19 7:43 ` Ioana Ciornei
2020-06-20 15:46 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200618222727.GM1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=alexandru.marginean@nxp.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).