From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DE3C433DF for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 22:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16725207DD for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 22:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732086AbgFRWho (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:37:44 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:47818 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726835AbgFRWhn (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:37:43 -0400 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1jm3AC-001BQe-Gz; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:37:40 +0200 Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:37:40 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Ioana Ciornei , netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, alexandru.marginean@nxp.com, michael@walle.cc, f.fainelli@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: phy: add Lynx PCS MDIO module Message-ID: <20200618223740.GD279339@lunn.ch> References: <20200618120837.27089-1-ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> <20200618120837.27089-5-ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> <20200618221352.GB279339@lunn.ch> <20200618222727.GM1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200618222727.GM1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > The other thing is, drivers/net/phy is becoming a little cluttered - > we have approaching 100 files there. > > Should we be thinking about drivers/net/phy/mdio/ (for mdio*), > drivers/net/phy/lib/ for the core phylib code or leaving it where > it is, and, hmm, drivers/net/phy/media/ maybe for the PHY and PCS > drivers? Or something like that? Hi Russell Do you have any experience how good git is at following file moves like this. We don't want to make it too hard for backporters of fixes. If it is not going to be too painful, then yes, mdio, phy and pcs subdirectories would be nice. Andrew