From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Dajun Jin <adajunjin@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: phy: Check harder for errors in get_phy_id()
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:26:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200619132659.GB304147@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200619044759.11387-3-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:47:59PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Commit 02a6efcab675 ("net: phy: allow scanning busses with missing
> phys") added a special condition to return -ENODEV in case -ENODEV or
> -EIO was returned from the first read of the MII_PHYSID1 register.
>
> In case the MDIO bus data line pull-up is not strong enough, the MDIO
> bus controller will not flag this as a read error. This can happen when
> a pluggable daughter card is not connected and weak internal pull-ups
> are used (since that is the only option, otherwise the pins are
> floating).
>
> The second read of MII_PHYSID2 will be correctly flagged an error
> though, but now we will return -EIO which will be treated as a hard
> error, thus preventing MDIO bus scanning loops to continue succesfully.
>
> Apply the same logic to both register reads, thus allowing the scanning
> logic to proceed.
Hi Florian
Maybe extend the kerneldoc for this function to document the return
values and there special meanings?
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
BTW: Did you look at get_phy_c45_ids()? Is it using the correct return
value? Given the current work being done to extend scanning to C45,
maybe it needs reviewing for issues like this.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-19 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-19 4:47 [PATCH net 0/2] net: phy: MDIO bus scanning fixes Florian Fainelli
2020-06-19 4:47 ` [PATCH net 1/2] of: of_mdio: Correct loop scanning logic Florian Fainelli
2020-06-19 13:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-19 4:47 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: phy: Check harder for errors in get_phy_id() Florian Fainelli
2020-06-19 13:26 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2020-06-19 13:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-19 18:42 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200619132659.GB304147@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=adajunjin@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).