netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, toke@redhat.com,
	lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
	brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/8] bpf: cpumap: add the possibility to attach an eBPF program to cpumap
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:48:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200622114837.278adefa@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <734113565894cb8447d1526e6a93eaf6ae994c2d.1592606391.git.lorenzo@kernel.org>

On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 00:57:20 +0200
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> wrote:

> +static int cpu_map_bpf_prog_run_xdp(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu,
> +				    void **xdp_frames, int n,
> +				    struct xdp_cpumap_stats *stats)
> +{
> +	struct xdp_rxq_info rxq;

I do think we can merge this code as-is (and I actually re-factored this
code offlist), but I have some optimizations I would like to try out.

E.g. as I've tried to explain over IRC, it will be possible to avoid
having to reconstruct xdp_rxq_info here, as we can use the
expected_attach_type and remap the BPF instructions to use info from
xdp_frame.  I want to benchmark it first, to see if it is worth it (we
will only save 2 store operations in a likely cache-hot area).


> +	struct bpf_prog *prog;
> +	struct xdp_buff xdp;
> +	int i, nframes = 0;
> +
> +	if (!rcpu->prog)
> +		return n;
> +
> +	xdp_set_return_frame_no_direct();
> +	xdp.rxq = &rxq;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +
> +	prog = READ_ONCE(rcpu->prog);
> +	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> +		struct xdp_frame *xdpf = xdp_frames[i];
> +		u32 act;
> +		int err;
> +
> +		rxq.dev = xdpf->dev_rx;
> +		rxq.mem = xdpf->mem;
> +		/* TODO: report queue_index to xdp_rxq_info */
> +
> +		xdp_convert_frame_to_buff(xdpf, &xdp);
> +
> +		act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, &xdp);
> +		switch (act) {
> +		case XDP_PASS:
> +			err = xdp_update_frame_from_buff(&xdp, xdpf);
> +			if (err < 0) {
> +				xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
> +				stats->drop++;
> +			} else {
> +				xdp_frames[nframes++] = xdpf;
> +				stats->pass++;
> +			}
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act);
> +			/* fallthrough */
> +		case XDP_DROP:
> +			xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
> +			stats->drop++;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	xdp_clear_return_frame_no_direct();
> +
> +	return nframes;
> +}



-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-22  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-19 22:57 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/8] introduce support for XDP programs in CPUMAP Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/8] net: Refactor xdp_convert_buff_to_frame Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-21 15:15   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-06-22 11:48     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/8] samples/bpf: xdp_redirect_cpu_user: do not update bpf maps in option loop Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-21 15:26   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-06-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/8] cpumap: formalize map value as a named struct Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-22  9:33   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-06-22 11:50     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/8] bpf: cpumap: add the possibility to attach an eBPF program to cpumap Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-22  9:48   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2020-06-23 14:56   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-06-23 15:23   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-06-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/8] bpf: cpumap: implement XDP_REDIRECT for eBPF programs attached to map entries Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 6/8] libbpf: add SEC name for xdp programs attached to CPUMAP Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-23  5:50   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-06-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 7/8] samples/bpf: xdp_redirect_cpu: load a eBPF program on cpumap Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 8/8] selftest: add tests for XDP programs in CPUMAP entries Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-23  5:55   ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200622114837.278adefa@carbon \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).