netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkelshb@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] thunderbolt: Get rid of E2E workaround
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:33:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200622163348.GU2795@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616115520.GK2795@lahna.fi.intel.com>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:55:25PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:54:52PM +0300, Yehezkel Bernat wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:55 PM Mika Westerberg
> > <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:41:32PM +0300, Yehezkel Bernat wrote:
> > > > > I think you are talking about the "prtstns" property in the network
> > > > > driver. There we only set TBNET_MATCH_FRAGS_ID (bit 1). This is the
> > > > > thing that get exposed to the other side of the connection and we never
> > > > > announced support for full E2E.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ah, yes, this one, Thanks!
> > > > As Windows driver uses it for flagging full-E2E, and we completely drop E2E
> > > > support here, it may worth to mention there that this is what bit 2 is used in
> > > > Windows so any reuse should consider the possible compatibility issue.
> > >
> > > Note we only drop dead code in this patch. It is that workaround for
> > > Falcon Ridge controller we actually never used.
> > >
> > > I can add a comment to the network driver about the full E2E support
> > > flag as a separate patch if you think it is useful.
> > >
> > > The network protocol will be public soon I guess because USB4 spec
> > > refers to "USB4 Inter-Domain Specification, Revision 1.0, [to be
> > > published] – (USB4 Inter-Domain Specification)" so I would expect it to
> > > be explained there as well.
> > 
> > I see. I leave it for your decision, then.
> > Thanks for bearing with me.
> 
> OK, I think it makes sense to add the comment so I'll do that as
> a separate patch (will probably go next week since I have some other
> patches to deal with this week, and Friday is holiday in Finland).

OK, I sent it now and can be found here:

  https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20200622163022.53298-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-22 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-15 13:01 [PATCH 0/4] thunderbolt: XDomain and NHI improvements Mika Westerberg
2020-06-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] thunderbolt: Build initial XDomain property block upon first connect Mika Westerberg
2020-06-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] thunderbolt: No need to warn if NHI hop_count != 12 or hop_count != 32 Mika Westerberg
2020-06-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] thunderbolt: NHI can use HopIDs 1-7 Mika Westerberg
2020-06-15 13:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] thunderbolt: Get rid of E2E workaround Mika Westerberg
2020-06-15 13:45   ` Yehezkel Bernat
2020-06-15 13:51     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-06-15 14:18       ` Yehezkel Bernat
2020-06-15 14:22         ` Mika Westerberg
2020-06-15 15:15           ` Yehezkel Bernat
2020-06-15 15:32             ` Mika Westerberg
2020-06-15 15:41               ` Yehezkel Bernat
2020-06-15 15:55                 ` Mika Westerberg
2020-06-15 19:54                   ` Yehezkel Bernat
2020-06-16 11:55                     ` Mika Westerberg
2020-06-22 16:33                       ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2020-06-29 15:37 ` [PATCH 0/4] thunderbolt: XDomain and NHI improvements Mika Westerberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200622163348.GU2795@lahna.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yehezkelshb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).