netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: mcgrof@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	bfields@fieldses.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	chainsaw@gentoo.org, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com,
	chuck.lever@oracle.com, davem@davemloft.net, dhowells@redhat.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com,
	jmorris@namei.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, philipp.reisner@linbit.com,
	ravenexp@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, serge@hallyn.com,
	slyfox@gentoo.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	markward@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:43:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200624144311.GA5839@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3118dc0d-a3af-9337-c897-2380062a8644@de.ibm.com>

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Does anyone have an idea why "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" breaks the
> linux-bridge on s390?

Are we even sure this is s390 specific and doesn't happen on other
architectures with the same bridge setup?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-24 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200610154923.27510-5-mcgrof@kernel.org>
2020-06-23 14:11 ` linux-next: umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used seems to break linux bridge on s390x (bisected) Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-23 14:23   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 11:11     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 12:05       ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 13:17         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 16:13           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 14:43       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-06-24 15:54         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 16:09           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-24 17:58             ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:09               ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:32                 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-24 18:37                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-25 13:26                     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  2:54                     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26  5:22                       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-06-26  9:00                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-26 11:40                           ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-26 11:50                             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-30 17:57                       ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 10:08                         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:24                           ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 13:53                             ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 14:08                               ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-01 15:38                                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:48                                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 15:58                                     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 16:01                                       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-02  4:26                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-02 19:46                                     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03  0:52                                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-07-03 13:28                                         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-01 15:26                               ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-07-01 13:46                           ` Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200624144311.GA5839@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chainsaw@gentoo.org \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markward@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
    --cc=ravenexp@gmail.com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=slyfox@gentoo.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).