From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC131C433DF for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 12:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08B92078D for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 12:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727028AbgFZMlI (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 08:41:08 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:51619 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725283AbgFZMlH (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 08:41:07 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id E4C1A68B02; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:41:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:41:04 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf , Maxim Mikityanskiy , "Karlsson, Magnus" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= Subject: Re: the XSK buffer pool needs be to reverted Message-ID: <20200626124104.GA8835@lst.de> References: <20200626074725.GA21790@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:22:41PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote: > Thanks for clarifying that. Let's work on a solution that can reside in > the dma mapping core. > >> The commit seems to have a long dove tail of commits depending on it >> despite only being a month old, so maybe you can do the revert for now? >> > > Reverting the whole series sounds a bit too much. Let's focus on the > part that breaks the dma api abstraction. I'm assuming that you're > referring to the > > static bool xp_check_cheap_dma(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool) > > function (and related functions called from that)? Yes. > >> Note that this is somewhat urgent, as various of the APIs that the code >> is abusing are slated to go away for Linux 5.9, so this addition comes >> at a really bad time. >> > > Understood. Wdyt about something in the lines of the diff below? It's > build tested only, but removes all non-dma API usage ("poking > internals"). Would that be a way forward, and then as a next step work > on a solution that would give similar benefits, but something that would > live in the dma mapping core? Yes, that would solve the immediate issues.