From: Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>,
bjorn@helgaas.com, Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varodek@gmail.com>,
Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>,
GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] qlge/qlge_main.c: use genric power management
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:21:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630002152.GA15435@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200629173116.GA3269550@bjorn-Precision-5520>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:31:16PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Vaibhav: s/genric/generic/ in the subject
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:09:36AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi Vaibhav,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on staging/staging-testing]
> > [also build test ERROR on v5.8-rc3 next-20200629]
> > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> >
> > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vaibhav-Gupta/drivers-staging-use-generic-power-management/20200629-163141
> > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git 347fa58ff5558075eec98725029c443c80ffbf4a
> > config: x86_64-rhel-7.6 (attached as .config)
> > compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > make W=1 ARCH=x86_64
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> If the patch has already been merged and we need an incremental patch
> that fixes *only* the build issue, I think it's fine to add a
> "Reported-by" tag.
>
> But if this patch hasn't been merged anywhere, I think adding the
> "Reported-by" tag would be pointless and distracting. This report
> should result in a v2 posting of the patch with the build issue fixed.
>
> There will be no evidence of the problem in the v2 patch. The patch
> itself contains other changes unrelated to the build issue, so
> "Reported-by" makes so sense for them. I would treat this as just
> another review comment, and we don't usually credit those in the
> commit log (though it's nice if they're mentioned in the v2 cover
> letter so reviewers know what changed and why).
>
> Is there any chance kbuild could be made smart enough to suggest the
> tag only when it finds an issue in some list of published trees?
Thanks a lot for the suggestion. As of now, this is a recommendation,
and user may judge based on own situation to add "as appropriate".
Meanwhile, we will continue making the bot better.
>
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c: In function 'qlge_resume':
> > >> drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c:4793:17: error: 'pdev' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'qdev'?
> > 4793 | pci_set_master(pdev);
> > | ^~~~
> > | qdev
> > ...
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-30 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-29 8:28 [PATCH v1 0/4] drivers/staging: use generic power management Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 8:28 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] qlge/qlge_main.c: use genric " Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 16:09 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-29 17:06 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 17:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-06-30 0:21 ` Philip Li [this message]
2020-06-29 8:28 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] staging/rtl8192e: use generic " Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 8:28 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] rts5208/rtsx.c: " Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 8:28 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] vt6655/device_main.c: " Vaibhav Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200630002152.GA15435@intel.com \
--to=philip.li@intel.com \
--cc=GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com \
--cc=bjorn@helgaas.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=manishc@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vaibhav.varodek@gmail.com \
--cc=vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).