From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6035C433E1 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92651207CD for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729333AbgGBNip (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:38:45 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:43690 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729115AbgGBNio (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:38:44 -0400 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1jqzQI-003KOo-Da; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 15:38:42 +0200 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 15:38:42 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Robert Marko Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org Subject: Re: [net-next,PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: mdio-ipq4019: add clock support Message-ID: <20200702133842.GK730739@lunn.ch> References: <20200702103001.233961-1-robert.marko@sartura.hr> <20200702103001.233961-5-robert.marko@sartura.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200702103001.233961-5-robert.marko@sartura.hr> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > + clock-frequency: > + default: 100000000 IEEE 802.3 says the default should be 2.5MHz. Some PHYs will go faster, but 100MHz seems unlikely! Andrew