From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF15C433E0 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCD420890 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 10:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="kB+9tCEz" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727803AbgGDKBU (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jul 2020 06:01:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53520 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726766AbgGDKBT (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jul 2020 06:01:19 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E760C061794; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 03:01:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1dt5GpWobPCWxADEO0CCn+J6WsbVv3IjpAPTzTvLYEY=; b=kB+9tCEzCM3n0z7SVN280nAhW EETrCJxjW1UJeb/mz1L93LQEBrd4JXv0kpEDG4e0yGMTK9soaNXghV0DptH0M/IBGlGmSCQTuaWL5 WYXc1FS5ZBcAeTSzmsrjd9zRBdvB/fBpLZorkQQGUIU4qtwy8R4Z7XkucAzZ6IRrdKyC/In3yE5tr +Kgixwhb8iIg2iUfk1VDwzyDTEdeSyAfvpASyCw+atVLM3ZD6aTaeg/bP5iVOK9R3nuv6GMD+XTTo wfhuuT0uvISJ4fzEQcVS78rM105qBEOU+YL+7zyOdvl85LG5pp2d+rnelNeDCzjLujtN3bg7zwUzR 3VPretJFw==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:35158) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jreyn-0004Yk-Nm; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 11:01:05 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jreyg-0003mR-WA; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 11:00:59 +0100 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2020 11:00:58 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: Michael Walle , netdev , lkml , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , Alex Marginean , Claudiu Manoil , Heiko Thiery Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next v3 0/3] net: enetc: remove bootloader dependency Message-ID: <20200704100058.GQ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20200701213433.9217-1-michael@walle.cc> <20200701215310.GL1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200702084128.GM1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 12:41:39PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 11:41, Russell King - ARM Linux admin > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:04:02AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 00:53, Russell King - ARM Linux admin > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > fixing up almost every driver the best I can with the exception of two - > > > > felix DSA and Mediatek. > > > > > > > > I'm not going to wait for Felix or Mediatek. As I say, I've given > > > > plenty of warning, and it's only a _suspicion_ of breakage on my > > > > side. > > > > > > > > > > What do you mean "I'm not going to wait for Felix"? > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200625152331.3784018-5-olteanv@gmail.com/ > > > We left it at: > > > > > > > I'm not going to review patch 7 > > > > tonight because of this fiasco. To pissed off to do a decent job, so > > > > you're just going to have to wait. > > > > > > So, I was actively waiting for you to review it ever since, just like > > > you said, so I could send a v2. Were you waiting for anything? > > > > I stopped being interested in your series with the patch 5 commit > > description issue; what happened there is really demotivating. > > > > -- > > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > > FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last! > > Yes, but I mean, the fact that reviewing felix is "demotivating" can > only have 2 courses of action as far as I can see: Sigh. I give up with you. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!