netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, gnault@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] l2tp: add sk_reuseport checks to l2tp_validate_socket
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 11:23:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200708102306.GB26371@katalix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200707183128.owsu62mnxp3k6lae@kafai-mbp>

On  Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 11:31:28 -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 12:45:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
> > Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 13:12:59 +0100
> > 
> > > The crash occurs in the socket destroy path. bpf_sk_reuseport_detach
> > > assumes ownership of sk_user_data if sk_reuseport is set and writes a
> > > NULL pointer to the memory pointed to by
> > > sk_user_data. bpf_sk_reuseport_detach is called via
> > > udp_lib_unhash. l2tp does its socket cleanup through sk_destruct,
> > > which fetches private data through sk_user_data. The BUG_ON fires
> > > because this data has been corrupted.
> > 
> > The ownership of sk_user_data has to be handled more cleanly.
> > 
> > BPF really has no business taking over this as it is for the protocols
> > to use and what L2TP is doing is quite natural and normal.  Exactly
> > what sk_user_data was designed to be used for.
> > 
> > I'm not applying this, please take this up with the BPF folks.  They
> > need to store their metadata elsewhere.
> Thanks for the report.
> 
> The sk_user_data is used when a sk is added to the bpf's reuseport_sockarray.
> Before it can be added, the bpf side does check if the sk_user_data has already been
> used or not.  It is the similar check like other usages on sk_user_data.
> 
> The missing part is the reuseport_detach_sock() should check if a
> sk is currently in a reuseport_sockarray before calling bpf_sk_reuseport_detach().
> It can be solved by remembering if a sk is added to the reuseport_sockarray.
> I will work on a fix by doing this.

Thanks Martin.

      reply	other threads:[~2020-07-08 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-06 12:12 [PATCH net] l2tp: add sk_reuseport checks to l2tp_validate_socket James Chapman
2020-07-06 19:45 ` David Miller
2020-07-07 18:31   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-07-08 10:23     ` James Chapman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200708102306.GB26371@katalix.com \
    --to=jchapman@katalix.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).