From: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Cc: bjorn.topel@intel.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, A.Zema@falconvsystems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] xsk: fix memory leak and packet loss in Tx skb path
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 09:34:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200710163448.7bkuohez2lqkf5tt@bsd-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1594363554-4076-1-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 08:45:54AM +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> In the skb Tx path, transmission of a packet is performed with
> dev_direct_xmit(). When QUEUE_STATE_FROZEN is set in the transmit
> routines, it returns NETDEV_TX_BUSY signifying that it was not
> possible to send the packet now, please try later. Unfortunately, the
> xsk transmit code discarded the packet, missed to free the skb, and
> returned EBUSY to the application. Fix this memory leak and
> unnecessary packet loss, by not discarding the packet in the Tx ring,
> freeing the allocated skb, and return EAGAIN. As EAGAIN is returned to the
> application, it can then retry the send operation and the packet will
> finally be sent as we will likely not be in the QUEUE_STATE_FROZEN
> state anymore. So EAGAIN tells the application that the packet was not
> discarded from the Tx ring and that it needs to call send()
> again. EBUSY, on the other hand, signifies that the packet was not
> sent and discarded from the Tx ring. The application needs to put the
> packet on the Tx ring again if it wants it to be sent.
>
> Fixes: 35fcde7f8deb ("xsk: support for Tx")
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Arkadiusz Zema <A.Zema@falconvsystems.com>
> Suggested-by: Arkadiusz Zema <A.Zema@falconvsystems.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
--
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-10 6:45 [PATCH bpf v2] xsk: fix memory leak and packet loss in Tx skb path Magnus Karlsson
2020-07-10 16:34 ` Jonathan Lemon [this message]
2020-07-10 23:26 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-07-11 7:39 ` Magnus Karlsson
2020-07-13 16:53 ` Jonathan Lemon
2020-07-15 18:36 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-07-16 4:43 ` Magnus Karlsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200710163448.7bkuohez2lqkf5tt@bsd-mbp \
--to=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=A.Zema@falconvsystems.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox