netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Priyaranjan Jha <priyarjha@google.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Priyaranjan Jha <priyarjha@google.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>,
	Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Yousuk Seung <ysseung@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: fix segment accounting when DSACK range covers multiple segments
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 12:12:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200716191235.1556723-2-priyarjha@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200716191235.1556723-1-priyarjha@google.com>

Currently, while processing DSACK, we assume DSACK covers only one
segment. This leads to significant underestimation of DSACKs with
LRO/GRO. This patch fixes segment accounting with DSACK by estimating
segment count from DSACK sequence range / MSS.

Signed-off-by: Priyaranjan Jha <priyarjha@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yousuk Seung <ysseung@google.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index b03ca68d4111..5d6bbcb1e570 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -871,12 +871,41 @@ __u32 tcp_init_cwnd(const struct tcp_sock *tp, const struct dst_entry *dst)
 	return min_t(__u32, cwnd, tp->snd_cwnd_clamp);
 }
 
+struct tcp_sacktag_state {
+	/* Timestamps for earliest and latest never-retransmitted segment
+	 * that was SACKed. RTO needs the earliest RTT to stay conservative,
+	 * but congestion control should still get an accurate delay signal.
+	 */
+	u64	first_sackt;
+	u64	last_sackt;
+	u32	reord;
+	u32	sack_delivered;
+	int	flag;
+	unsigned int mss_now;
+	struct rate_sample *rate;
+};
+
 /* Take a notice that peer is sending D-SACKs */
-static void tcp_dsack_seen(struct tcp_sock *tp)
+static u32 tcp_dsack_seen(struct tcp_sock *tp, u32 start_seq,
+			  u32 end_seq, struct tcp_sacktag_state *state)
 {
+	u32 seq_len, dup_segs = 1;
+
+	if (before(start_seq, end_seq)) {
+		seq_len = end_seq - start_seq;
+		if (seq_len > tp->mss_cache)
+			dup_segs = DIV_ROUND_UP(seq_len, tp->mss_cache);
+	}
+
 	tp->rx_opt.sack_ok |= TCP_DSACK_SEEN;
 	tp->rack.dsack_seen = 1;
-	tp->dsack_dups++;
+	tp->dsack_dups += dup_segs;
+
+	state->flag |= FLAG_DSACKING_ACK;
+	/* A spurious retransmission is delivered */
+	state->sack_delivered += dup_segs;
+
+	return dup_segs;
 }
 
 /* It's reordering when higher sequence was delivered (i.e. sacked) before
@@ -1103,53 +1132,37 @@ static bool tcp_is_sackblock_valid(struct tcp_sock *tp, bool is_dsack,
 
 static bool tcp_check_dsack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
 			    struct tcp_sack_block_wire *sp, int num_sacks,
-			    u32 prior_snd_una)
+			    u32 prior_snd_una, struct tcp_sacktag_state *state)
 {
 	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
 	u32 start_seq_0 = get_unaligned_be32(&sp[0].start_seq);
 	u32 end_seq_0 = get_unaligned_be32(&sp[0].end_seq);
-	bool dup_sack = false;
+	u32 dup_segs;
 
 	if (before(start_seq_0, TCP_SKB_CB(ack_skb)->ack_seq)) {
-		dup_sack = true;
-		tcp_dsack_seen(tp);
 		NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPDSACKRECV);
 	} else if (num_sacks > 1) {
 		u32 end_seq_1 = get_unaligned_be32(&sp[1].end_seq);
 		u32 start_seq_1 = get_unaligned_be32(&sp[1].start_seq);
 
-		if (!after(end_seq_0, end_seq_1) &&
-		    !before(start_seq_0, start_seq_1)) {
-			dup_sack = true;
-			tcp_dsack_seen(tp);
-			NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk),
-					LINUX_MIB_TCPDSACKOFORECV);
-		}
+		if (after(end_seq_0, end_seq_1) || before(start_seq_0, start_seq_1))
+			return false;
+		NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPDSACKOFORECV);
+	} else {
+		return false;
 	}
 
+	dup_segs = tcp_dsack_seen(tp, start_seq_0, end_seq_0, state);
+
 	/* D-SACK for already forgotten data... Do dumb counting. */
-	if (dup_sack && tp->undo_marker && tp->undo_retrans > 0 &&
+	if (tp->undo_marker && tp->undo_retrans > 0 &&
 	    !after(end_seq_0, prior_snd_una) &&
 	    after(end_seq_0, tp->undo_marker))
-		tp->undo_retrans--;
+		tp->undo_retrans = max_t(int, 0, tp->undo_retrans - dup_segs);
 
-	return dup_sack;
+	return true;
 }
 
-struct tcp_sacktag_state {
-	u32	reord;
-	/* Timestamps for earliest and latest never-retransmitted segment
-	 * that was SACKed. RTO needs the earliest RTT to stay conservative,
-	 * but congestion control should still get an accurate delay signal.
-	 */
-	u64	first_sackt;
-	u64	last_sackt;
-	struct rate_sample *rate;
-	int	flag;
-	unsigned int mss_now;
-	u32	sack_delivered;
-};
-
 /* Check if skb is fully within the SACK block. In presence of GSO skbs,
  * the incoming SACK may not exactly match but we can find smaller MSS
  * aligned portion of it that matches. Therefore we might need to fragment
@@ -1692,12 +1705,7 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
 		tcp_highest_sack_reset(sk);
 
 	found_dup_sack = tcp_check_dsack(sk, ack_skb, sp_wire,
-					 num_sacks, prior_snd_una);
-	if (found_dup_sack) {
-		state->flag |= FLAG_DSACKING_ACK;
-		/* A spurious retransmission is delivered */
-		state->sack_delivered++;
-	}
+					 num_sacks, prior_snd_una, state);
 
 	/* Eliminate too old ACKs, but take into
 	 * account more or less fresh ones, they can
-- 
2.27.0.389.gc38d7665816-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-16 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-16 19:12 [PATCH net-next 0/2] tcp: improve handling of DSACK covering multiple segments Priyaranjan Jha
2020-07-16 19:12 ` Priyaranjan Jha [this message]
2020-07-16 19:12 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] tcp: add SNMP counter for no. of duplicate segments reported by DSACK Priyaranjan Jha
2020-07-17 19:54 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] tcp: improve handling of DSACK covering multiple segments David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200716191235.1556723-2-priyarjha@google.com \
    --to=priyarjha@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    --cc=ysseung@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).