From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix slab-out-of-bounds in SCTP_DELAYED_SACK processing
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:30:25 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200723153025.GF3307@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200723092238.GA21143@lst.de>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:22:38AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:42:31PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > Cc'ing linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org.
>
> What do you think of this version, which I think is a little cleaner?
It splits up the argument parsing from the actual handling, ok. Looks
good. Just one point:
> +static int sctp_setsockopt_delayed_ack(struct sock *sk,
> + struct sctp_sack_info *params,
> + unsigned int optlen)
> +{
> + if (optlen == sizeof(struct sctp_assoc_value)) {
> + struct sctp_sack_info p;
> +
> + pr_warn_ratelimited(DEPRECATED
> + "%s (pid %d) "
> + "Use of struct sctp_assoc_value in delayed_ack socket option.\n"
> + "Use struct sctp_sack_info instead\n",
> + current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> +
> + memcpy(&p, params, sizeof(struct sctp_assoc_value));
> + p.sack_freq = p.sack_delay ? 0 : 1;
Please add a comment saying that sctp_sack_info.sack_delay maps
exactly to sctp_assoc_value.assoc_value, so that's why we can do
memcpy and read assoc_value as sack_delay. I think it will help us not
trip on this again in the future.
> + return __sctp_setsockopt_delayed_ack(sk, &p);
> + }
> +
> + if (optlen != sizeof(struct sctp_sack_info))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (params->sack_delay == 0 && params->sack_freq == 0)
> + return 0;
> + return __sctp_setsockopt_delayed_ack(sk, params);
> +}
> +
> /* 7.1.3 Initialization Parameters (SCTP_INITMSG)
> *
> * Applications can specify protocol parameters for the default association
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-23 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-22 20:38 [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix slab-out-of-bounds in SCTP_DELAYED_SACK processing Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-07-22 20:42 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-07-23 9:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-23 15:30 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2020-07-24 6:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200723153025.GF3307@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).