From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8911CC433E0 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694D92065C for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731252AbgG1QIF (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:08:05 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:60152 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731137AbgG1QIF (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:08:05 -0400 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1k0S94-007Ixs-Jy; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:08:02 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:08:02 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Ioana Ciornei Cc: netdev , Florian Fainelli , Russell King , Heiner Kallweit Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy Message-ID: <20200728160802.GI1705504@lunn.ch> References: <20200727204731.1705418-1-andrew@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > I think that the MAINTAINERS file should also be updated to mention the new > path to the drivers. Just did a quick grep after 'drivers/net/phy': > F: drivers/net/phy/adin.c > F: drivers/net/phy/mdio-xgene.c > F: drivers/net/phy/ > F: drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c > F: drivers/net/phy/mdio-mvusb.c > F: drivers/net/phy/dp83640* > F: drivers/net/phy/phylink.c > F: drivers/net/phy/sfp* > F: drivers/net/phy/mdio-xpcs.c Hi Ioana Thanks, I will take care of that. > Other than that, the new 'drivers/net/phy/phy/' path is somewhat repetitive but > unfortunately I do not have another better suggestion. Me neither. I wonder if we are looking at the wrong part of the patch. drivers/net/X/phy/ drivers/net/X/mdio/ drivers/net/X/pcs/ Question is, what would X be? Andrew