From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, kuba@kernel.org,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-nex 2/2] net: mvneta: Don't speed down the PHY when changing mtu
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:53:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200729175312.6d6370cf@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200728.175202.598794850221205861.davem@davemloft.net>
Hi David,
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:52:02 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote:
>
>
> > @@ -3651,7 +3651,8 @@ static void mvneta_stop_dev(struct mvneta_port *pp)
> >
> > set_bit(__MVNETA_DOWN, &pp->state);
> >
> > - if (device_may_wakeup(&pp->dev->dev))
> > + if (device_may_wakeup(&pp->dev->dev) &&
> > + pp->pkt_size == MVNETA_RX_PKT_SIZE(pp->dev->mtu))
> > phylink_speed_down(pp->phylink, false);
> >
>
> This is too much for me.
>
> You shouldn't have to shut down the entire device and take it back up
> again just to change the MTU.
>
> Unfortunately, this is a common pattern in many drivers and it is very
> dangerous to take this lazy path of just doing "stop/start" around
> the MTU change.
>
> It means you can't recover from partial failures properly,
> f.e. recovering from an inability to allocate queue resources for the
> new MTU.
>
> To solve this properly, you must restructure the MTU change such that
> is specifically stops the necessary and only the units of the chip
> necessary to change the MTU.
>
> It should next try to allocate the necessary resources to satisfy the
> MTU change, keeping the existing resources allocated in case of
> failure.
>
> Then, only is all resources are successfully allocated, it should
> commit the MTU change fully and without errors.
>
> Then none of these link flapping issues are even possible.
Thanks a lot for pointing out the correct direction. Refactoring change
mtu method needs more time(maybe for linux-5.10 is reasonable), so I
just drop patch2 in v2.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-29 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-27 11:50 [PATCH net-nex 0/2] net: mvneta: improve phylink_speed_up/down usage Jisheng Zhang
2020-07-27 11:51 ` [PATCH net-nex 1/2] net: mvneta: fix comment about phylink_speed_down Jisheng Zhang
2020-07-27 11:53 ` [PATCH net-nex 2/2] net: mvneta: Don't speed down the PHY when changing mtu Jisheng Zhang
2020-07-29 0:52 ` David Miller
2020-07-29 9:53 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200729175312.6d6370cf@xhacker.debian \
--to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).