netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-nex 2/2] net: mvneta: Don't speed down the PHY when changing mtu
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:53:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200729175312.6d6370cf@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200728.175202.598794850221205861.davem@davemloft.net>

Hi David,

On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:52:02 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote:

> 
> 
> > @@ -3651,7 +3651,8 @@ static void mvneta_stop_dev(struct mvneta_port *pp)
> >
> >       set_bit(__MVNETA_DOWN, &pp->state);
> >
> > -     if (device_may_wakeup(&pp->dev->dev))
> > +     if (device_may_wakeup(&pp->dev->dev) &&
> > +         pp->pkt_size == MVNETA_RX_PKT_SIZE(pp->dev->mtu))
> >               phylink_speed_down(pp->phylink, false);
> >  
> 
> This is too much for me.
> 
> You shouldn't have to shut down the entire device and take it back up
> again just to change the MTU.
> 
> Unfortunately, this is a common pattern in many drivers and it is very
> dangerous to take this lazy path of just doing "stop/start" around
> the MTU change.
> 
> It means you can't recover from partial failures properly,
> f.e. recovering from an inability to allocate queue resources for the
> new MTU.
> 
> To solve this properly, you must restructure the MTU change such that
> is specifically stops the necessary and only the units of the chip
> necessary to change the MTU.
> 
> It should next try to allocate the necessary resources to satisfy the
> MTU change, keeping the existing resources allocated in case of
> failure.
> 
> Then, only is all resources are successfully allocated, it should
> commit the MTU change fully and without errors.
> 
> Then none of these link flapping issues are even possible.

Thanks a lot for pointing out the correct direction. Refactoring change
mtu method needs more time(maybe for linux-5.10 is reasonable), so I
just drop patch2 in v2.

      reply	other threads:[~2020-07-29  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-27 11:50 [PATCH net-nex 0/2] net: mvneta: improve phylink_speed_up/down usage Jisheng Zhang
2020-07-27 11:51 ` [PATCH net-nex 1/2] net: mvneta: fix comment about phylink_speed_down Jisheng Zhang
2020-07-27 11:53 ` [PATCH net-nex 2/2] net: mvneta: Don't speed down the PHY when changing mtu Jisheng Zhang
2020-07-29  0:52   ` David Miller
2020-07-29  9:53     ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200729175312.6d6370cf@xhacker.debian \
    --to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).