netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	eli@mellanox.com, lulu@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: vdpa: remove per device feature whitelist
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:19:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811061840-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200720085043.16485-1-jasowang@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 04:50:43PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We used to have a per device feature whitelist to filter out the
> unsupported virtio features. But this seems unnecessary since:
> 
> - the main idea behind feature whitelist is to block control vq
>   feature until we finalize the control virtqueue API. But the current
>   vhost-vDPA uAPI is sufficient to support control virtqueue. For
>   device that has hardware control virtqueue, the vDPA device driver
>   can just setup the hardware virtqueue and let userspace to use
>   hardware virtqueue directly. For device that doesn't have a control
>   virtqueue, the vDPA device driver need to use e.g vringh to emulate
>   a software control virtqueue.
> - we don't do it in virtio-vDPA driver
> 
> So remove this limitation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>


Thinking about it, should we block some bits?
E.g. access_platform?
they depend on qemu not vdpa ...

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 37 -------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index 77a0c9fb6cc3..f7f6ddd681ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -26,35 +26,6 @@
>  
>  #include "vhost.h"
>  
> -enum {
> -	VHOST_VDPA_FEATURES =
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX),
> -
> -	VHOST_VDPA_NET_FEATURES = VHOST_VDPA_FEATURES |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO4) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_ECN) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_UFO) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX),
> -};
> -
>  /* Currently, only network backend w/o multiqueue is supported. */
>  #define VHOST_VDPA_VQ_MAX	2
>  
> @@ -79,10 +50,6 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(vhost_vdpa_ida);
>  
>  static dev_t vhost_vdpa_major;
>  
> -static const u64 vhost_vdpa_features[] = {
> -	[VIRTIO_ID_NET] = VHOST_VDPA_NET_FEATURES,
> -};
> -
>  static void handle_vq_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
>  {
>  	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue,
> @@ -255,7 +222,6 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_get_features(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u64 __user *featurep)
>  	u64 features;
>  
>  	features = ops->get_features(vdpa);
> -	features &= vhost_vdpa_features[v->virtio_id];
>  
>  	if (copy_to_user(featurep, &features, sizeof(features)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
> @@ -279,9 +245,6 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_features(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u64 __user *featurep)
>  	if (copy_from_user(&features, featurep, sizeof(features)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
> -	if (features & ~vhost_vdpa_features[v->virtio_id])
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	if (ops->set_features(vdpa, features))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1


      reply	other threads:[~2020-08-11 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-20  8:50 [PATCH] vhost: vdpa: remove per device feature whitelist Jason Wang
2020-08-11 10:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200811061840-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=eli@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lulu@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).