From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E11DC433DF for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 22:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311C82078D for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 22:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729467AbgHPWQU (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Aug 2020 18:16:20 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:55624 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728057AbgHPWQU (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Aug 2020 18:16:20 -0400 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1k7Qws-009dEk-Lh; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:16:18 +0200 Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:16:18 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: David Miller , netdev , Chris Healy , Vivien Didelot Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: dsa: wire up devlink info get Message-ID: <20200816221618.GB2294711@lunn.ch> References: <20200816194316.2291489-1-andrew@lunn.ch> <20200816194316.2291489-7-andrew@lunn.ch> <20200816215630.l7rdynh4ymx426uq@skbuf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200816215630.l7rdynh4ymx426uq@skbuf> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > > +static int dsa_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *dl, > > + struct devlink_info_req *req, > > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) > > +{ > > + struct dsa_switch *ds; > > + > > + ds = dsa_devlink_to_ds(dl); > > + > > Why not place the declaration and the assignment on a single line? This code went through a few refactors. Probably at some point i could not keep reverse christmass tree so had to split it. And it then never got put back together again. I will fix it up for v2. Andrew