From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C279CC433DF for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92056207D3 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="UHKFH64e" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726336AbgHXIQ1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 04:16:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58946 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725924AbgHXIQ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 04:16:26 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com (mail-wr1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::442]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48E3AC061573 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:16:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id a5so7737921wrm.6 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:16:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=WIZAf3x2BneXQTTKPWzLh7lCftlSclIRyCF/Mlb3EW4=; b=UHKFH64eK+dJNPTMUEG2GKmEf2QnNltVe6HCRpFWZspvwFb52ZYmQiiZ4kCn7gaF2n SXWHdJsGJdH3VASepqgugyFAniRVIf2/X+rV8wETDho6CtJwZxWFMEqRrP7qLqT0XnBu YeX+uSKhRk43xBqG+pNd/UgX22Fejf0PMRAWhlTDfbe4xvd6zuPGst55lUXGpU5bGOSi JJc8XAbBvVpdlaTys1EakKWsoJfhau+xKzZ49CNCDNf/Xm8fye7qn+8sIvjmFYZmYqDK 51Pg1dKN8+2RkirYUoo7Y6SGAHGMfsl7fyD6/Xi2nyGomPK46Dz9HxN0fIKyv90Y7jg8 ho2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=WIZAf3x2BneXQTTKPWzLh7lCftlSclIRyCF/Mlb3EW4=; b=rs/6Y1kKBThTOvHfODtaQA9qlVD85nYWlbclD1+QxrXqSPTZp+K3lemTJfRbu0TBcH EtGaNm7acjlPBV0uqQHOpFcrfdMseUR5MoVYEJsRTIQgeGrxUiIbGH7VxiMydMaoa3wh VXZOQX1zhdh1AJm6epu3jdZnHc7XWTja5lAdHS32s0ZhGv4DdSjAMgJmsPrz0R+yfb86 /bqJpcHUqizRW+YombPfvVNMFNfaI6w76swlQstYOuNyYwngulN0dJYVgmqJz8HPduQ+ ufcP/iFaXVbFIXlkWqTB0T+gUN7/ZsFL3Y0WZ+M2aPX7GIdkLdvmj+NM236/hBQJ0L1b AKJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530YR5jVr7Fd+0d9DiMhXRKz2k5XeeI+CVvqFyMI/a8GAffGTMs2 eP8xQoioGEz+aBqzUDzshtvD9g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQ1dfhud31uvmhWjcNOV9nz6EpZ3fFDfyZlE0Rpp4BVPYFIT8QORlNPZLa72KkbDqugJRCWA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1211:: with SMTP id e17mr4734550wrx.263.1598256984974; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:16:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell ([95.149.164.62]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w1sm22294675wmc.18.2020.08.24.01.16.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:16:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:16:22 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Christian Lamparter Cc: kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] Set 2: Rid W=1 warnings in Wireless Message-ID: <20200824081622.GI3248864@dell> References: <20200821071644.109970-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 22 Aug 2020, Christian Lamparter wrote: > On 2020-08-21 09:16, Lee Jones wrote: > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > niggly little warnings. > > > I see that after our discussion about the carl9170 change in this > thread following your patch: > > you decided the best way to address our requirements, was to "drop" > your patch from the series, instead of just implementing the requested > changes. :( No, this is "set 2", not "v2". The patch you refer to is in the first set. Looks like I am waiting for your reply [0]: [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/334 > > There are quite a few W=1 warnings in the Wireless. My plan > > is to work through all of them over the next few weeks. > > Hopefully it won't be too long before drivers/net/wireless > > builds clean with W=1 enabled. > > Just a parting note for your consideration: > > Since 5.7 [0], it has become rather easy to also compile the linux kernel > with clang and the LLVM Utilities. > > > I hope this information can help you to see beyond that one-unamed > "compiler" bias there... I wish you the best of luck in your endeavors. Never used them. GCC has always worked well for me. What are their benefits over GCC? I already build for 5 architectures locally and a great deal more (arch * defconfigs) using remote testing infrastructures. Multiplying them without very good reason sounds like a *potential* waste of already limited computation resources. > Christian > > [0] -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog