From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@nxp.com>,
Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kaloyan Nikolov <konik98@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] mwifiex: Increase AES key storage size to 256 bits
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:51:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200825185151.GV5493@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200825153829.38043-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 05:38:29PM +0200, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> Following commit e18696786548 ("mwifiex: Prevent memory corruption
> handling keys") the mwifiex driver fails to authenticate with certain
> networks, specifically networks with 256 bit keys, and repeatedly asks
> for the password. The kernel log repeats the following lines (id and
> bssid redacted):
>
> mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: trying to associate to '<id>' bssid <bssid>
> mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: associated to bssid <bssid> successfully
> mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: crypto keys added
> mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: successfully disconnected from <bssid>: reason code 3
>
> Tracking down this problem lead to the overflow check introduced by the
> aforementioned commit into mwifiex_ret_802_11_key_material_v2(). This
> check fails on networks with 256 bit keys due to the current storage
> size for AES keys in struct mwifiex_aes_param being only 128 bit.
>
> To fix this issue, increase the storage size for AES keys to 256 bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Kaloyan Nikolov <konik98@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Kaloyan Nikolov <konik98@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h
> index 8047e307892e3..d9f8bdbc817b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h
> @@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ struct mwifiex_tkip_param {
> struct mwifiex_aes_param {
> u8 pn[WPA_PN_SIZE];
> __le16 key_len;
> - u8 key[WLAN_KEY_LEN_CCMP];
> + u8 key[WLAN_KEY_LEN_CCMP_256];
> } __packed;
>
> struct mwifiex_wapi_param {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c
> index 962d8bfe6f101..119ccacd1fcc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c
> @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ static int mwifiex_ret_802_11_key_material_v2(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
> key_v2 = &resp->params.key_material_v2;
>
> len = le16_to_cpu(key_v2->key_param_set.key_params.aes.key_len);
> - if (len > WLAN_KEY_LEN_CCMP)
> + if (len > sizeof(key_v2->key_param_set.key_params.aes.key))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (le16_to_cpu(key_v2->action) == HostCmd_ACT_GEN_SET) {
> @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int mwifiex_ret_802_11_key_material_v2(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
> return 0;
>
> memset(priv->aes_key_v2.key_param_set.key_params.aes.key, 0,
> - WLAN_KEY_LEN_CCMP);
> + sizeof(key_v2->key_param_set.key_params.aes.key));
> priv->aes_key_v2.key_param_set.key_params.aes.key_len =
> cpu_to_le16(len);
> memcpy(priv->aes_key_v2.key_param_set.key_params.aes.key,
It's good to get the sizes correct.
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
I sort of feel like the code was broken before I added the bounds
checking but it's also okay if the Fixes tag points to my change as
well just to make backporting easier.
Fixes: e18696786548 ("mwifiex: Prevent memory corruption handling keys")
Another question would be if it would be better to move the bounds
check after the "if (key_v2->key_param_set.key_type != KEY_TYPE_ID_AES)"
check? Do we care if the length is invalid on the other paths?
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-25 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 15:38 [PATCH net] mwifiex: Increase AES key storage size to 256 bits Maximilian Luz
2020-08-25 18:51 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2020-08-25 20:17 ` Maximilian Luz
2020-08-25 19:30 ` Brian Norris
2020-08-25 20:18 ` Maximilian Luz
2020-08-27 8:02 ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-27 13:16 ` [net] " Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200825185151.GV5493@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=amitkarwar@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ganapathi.bhat@nxp.com \
--cc=huxinming820@gmail.com \
--cc=konik98@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).