From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>,
Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/8] s390/qeth: updates 2020-08-27
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:16:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200827081705.21922-1-jwi@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi Dave & Jakub,
please apply the following patch series for qeth to netdev's net-next tree.
Patch 8 makes some improvements to how we handle HW address events,
avoiding some uncertainty around processing stale events after we
switched off the feature.
Except for that it's all straight-forward cleanups.
Thanks,
Julian
Julian Wiedmann (8):
s390/qeth: clean up qeth_l3_send_setdelmc()'s declaration
s390/qeth: use to_delayed_work()
s390/qeth: make queue lock a proper spinlock
s390/qeth: don't disable address events during initialization
s390/qeth: don't let HW override the configured port role
s390/qeth: copy less data from bridge state events
s390/qeth: unify structs for bridge port state
s390/qeth: strictly order bridge address events
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core.h | 14 ++---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 85 ++++++++-------------------
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_mpc.h | 14 +----
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_sys.c | 1 +
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c | 3 +-
6 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-08-27 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-27 8:16 Julian Wiedmann [this message]
2020-08-27 8:16 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] s390/qeth: clean up qeth_l3_send_setdelmc()'s declaration Julian Wiedmann
2020-08-27 8:16 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] s390/qeth: use to_delayed_work() Julian Wiedmann
2020-08-27 8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] s390/qeth: make queue lock a proper spinlock Julian Wiedmann
2020-08-27 8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] s390/qeth: don't disable address events during initialization Julian Wiedmann
2020-08-27 8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] s390/qeth: don't let HW override the configured port role Julian Wiedmann
2020-08-27 8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] s390/qeth: copy less data from bridge state events Julian Wiedmann
2020-08-27 8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] s390/qeth: unify structs for bridge port state Julian Wiedmann
2020-08-27 8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] s390/qeth: strictly order bridge address events Julian Wiedmann
2020-08-27 14:43 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] s390/qeth: updates 2020-08-27 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200827081705.21922-1-jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).