From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: brouer@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
magnus.karlsson@intel.com, bjorn.topel@intel.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] xsk: exit NAPI loop when AF_XDP Rx ring is full
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 16:27:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200904162751.632c4443@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200904135332.60259-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 15:53:25 +0200
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On my machine the "one core scenario Rx drop" performance went from
> ~65Kpps to 21Mpps. In other words, from "not usable" to
> "usable". YMMV.
We have observed this kind of dropping off an edge before with softirq
(when userspace process runs on same RX-CPU), but I thought that Eric
Dumazet solved it in 4cd13c21b207 ("softirq: Let ksoftirqd do its job").
I wonder what makes AF_XDP different or if the problem have come back?
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-04 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-04 13:53 [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] xsk: exit NAPI loop when AF_XDP Rx ring is full Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] xsk: improve xdp_do_redirect() error codes Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] xdp: introduce xdp_do_redirect_ext() function Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] xsk: introduce xsk_do_redirect_rx_full() helper Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 15:11 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-04 15:39 ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-07 12:45 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/6] i40e, xsk: finish napi loop if AF_XDP Rx queue is full Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] ice, " Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] ixgbe, " Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 15:35 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-04 15:54 ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 13:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] xsk: exit NAPI loop when AF_XDP Rx ring " Björn Töpel
2020-09-08 10:32 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2020-09-08 11:37 ` Magnus Karlsson
2020-09-08 12:21 ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-09 15:37 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-09-04 14:27 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2020-09-04 14:32 ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-04 23:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-07 13:37 ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-07 18:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-08 6:58 ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-08 17:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-08 18:28 ` Björn Töpel
2020-09-08 18:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200904162751.632c4443@carbon \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).