netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] net: tracepoint: fix print wrong sysctl_mem value
Date: Mon,  7 Sep 2020 22:47:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200907144757.43389-1-dust.li@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)

sysctl_mem is an point, and tracepoint entry do not support
been visited like an array. Use 3 long type to get sysctl_mem
instead.

tracpoint output with and without this fix:
- without fix:
   28821.074 sock:sock_exceed_buf_limit:proto:UDP
   sysctl_mem=-1741233440,19,322156906942464 allocated=19 sysctl_rmem=4096
   rmem_alloc=75008 sysctl_wmem=4096 wmem_alloc=1 wmem_queued=0
   kind=SK_MEM_RECV

- with fix:
  2126.136 sock:sock_exceed_buf_limit:proto:UDP
  sysctl_mem=18,122845,184266 allocated=19 sysctl_rmem=4096
  rmem_alloc=73728 sysctl_wmem=4096 wmem_alloc=1 wmem_queued=0
  kind=SK_MEM_RECV

Fixes: 3847ce32aea9fdf ("core: add tracepoints for queueing skb to rcvbuf")
Signed-off-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 include/trace/events/sock.h | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/sock.h b/include/trace/events/sock.h
index a966d4b5ab37..9118dd2353b7 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/sock.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/sock.h
@@ -98,7 +98,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sock_exceed_buf_limit,
 
 	TP_STRUCT__entry(
 		__array(char, name, 32)
-		__field(long *, sysctl_mem)
+		__field(long, sysctl_mem0)
+		__field(long, sysctl_mem1)
+		__field(long, sysctl_mem2)
 		__field(long, allocated)
 		__field(int, sysctl_rmem)
 		__field(int, rmem_alloc)
@@ -110,7 +112,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sock_exceed_buf_limit,
 
 	TP_fast_assign(
 		strncpy(__entry->name, prot->name, 32);
-		__entry->sysctl_mem = prot->sysctl_mem;
+		__entry->sysctl_mem0 = prot->sysctl_mem[0];
+		__entry->sysctl_mem1 = prot->sysctl_mem[1];
+		__entry->sysctl_mem2 = prot->sysctl_mem[2];
 		__entry->allocated = allocated;
 		__entry->sysctl_rmem = sk_get_rmem0(sk, prot);
 		__entry->rmem_alloc = atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
@@ -122,9 +126,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sock_exceed_buf_limit,
 
 	TP_printk("proto:%s sysctl_mem=%ld,%ld,%ld allocated=%ld sysctl_rmem=%d rmem_alloc=%d sysctl_wmem=%d wmem_alloc=%d wmem_queued=%d kind=%s",
 		__entry->name,
-		__entry->sysctl_mem[0],
-		__entry->sysctl_mem[1],
-		__entry->sysctl_mem[2],
+		__entry->sysctl_mem0,
+		__entry->sysctl_mem1,
+		__entry->sysctl_mem2,
 		__entry->allocated,
 		__entry->sysctl_rmem,
 		__entry->rmem_alloc,
-- 
2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7


             reply	other threads:[~2020-09-07 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-07 14:47 Dust Li [this message]
2020-09-07 17:50 ` [PATCH] net: tracepoint: fix print wrong sysctl_mem value Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-08  1:50   ` dust.li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200907144757.43389-1-dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=satoru.moriya@hds.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).