From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
tariqt@mellanox.com, yishaih@mellanox.com,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: make sure to always set the port type
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 20:51:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200907175155.GD421756@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200907093614.12231d6b@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 09:36:14AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 09:48:30 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >>>> And can we call to devlink_port_type_*_set() without IS_ENABLED() check?
> >>>
> >>> It'll generate two netlink notifications - not the end of the world but
> >>> also doesn't feel super clean.
> >
> > I would say that such a situation is corner case during the driver init and
> > not an end of the world to see double netlink message.
>
> Could you spell out your reasoning here? Are you concerned about
> out-of-tree drivers?
Nothing fancy, I just didn't see users who compiled mlx4_core and used
it without eth/ib.
The corner case is because this double netlink can be seen only during
driver reload and only if port type wasn't set.
>
> I don't see how adding IS_ENABLED() to the condition outweighs
> the benefit of not having duplicated netlink notifications.
Readability?
Anyway, it doesn't matter.
Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-07 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-04 20:06 [PATCH net-next] mlx4: make sure to always set the port type Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-06 7:27 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-06 16:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-07 6:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-07 6:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-07 7:19 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-07 9:10 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-07 16:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-07 16:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-07 16:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-07 17:51 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200907175155.GD421756@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
--cc=yishaih@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).