From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98701C433E2 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 01:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAC02193E for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 01:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="tOFUTIpa" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728241AbgIHBIM (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 21:08:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58622 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726918AbgIHBIM (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 21:08:12 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x543.google.com (mail-ed1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B7EEC061573 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x543.google.com with SMTP id l17so14193325edq.12 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 18:08:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=aMxTA5hMeRHlB7QEUVotIMvd37GA7LvdlT/HUpiUX3Q=; b=tOFUTIpa5dWFOX40OuoW37NucAgHJwZ6iK6D1XWaq8TikMJnIgtsGIUEkOzD0Co6Pb jnDZsj3GtJBESS+CrNAagy0TNCDj4fLSES0S3oYB9U887qdOw5fucO6z+xnGi4P1OTUW bO4BvDcG1uZw+Fw4xcNNi+hfIzBFsAplVDBrhn7gNZRrYxj7vFDEAeGbuteeiwoTETlZ ji8vC21Jckx5kEpUi3/Q2RGkoqUI79toHXf0kicXO6GAd/eGg3oAgpVFxLYNyIX2t20S u7MIA5NfkrpcttHcU0TjrSoQHB8Fc2go5bgGZWQoLLMEkZRRStizo6SZS+lA78lO2kpC S6Vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=aMxTA5hMeRHlB7QEUVotIMvd37GA7LvdlT/HUpiUX3Q=; b=n4UDvd9Usm1Qh7/7vmJ2w1qKBNOBMIJdbKiv6BBeVss/1u+FIZsN4SI+GFv37pK0PQ f0105lnis9u9DoAs6RpLzlBI7E80s/UAkz+MQJAzmKsjSMMEZEzUPKxcadKiu4p9USM8 7/Kxpx6uccXk1q4POzSkSVerCrqSOUAoqtpa8HBGa5JV+Mmf3LvWWRo3kTq5h2hsq2LE FNrjwbTWb4UAPdBtf/4MiVbR8WuJzCOZoJnEcpqbnAW7HndPEfhug2okv0F7QQKbvLs2 xFFfsoggMllknrzpmP+O4bPg30DJUneDnUZJcXtCET+KUpiD/Ub7q2X0b8esv6x5K+ex oL1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533etsOhCccp3f8jmOURMKxXbXi2XMkgBZyB3OwoNPNiMj/J8RtD lR7vmkelChrLUGNJDMK+JLaM2mq/A+g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw32RdDo3W1An+LENVw08NjCwOPkYeWY5Gf9a6TbhV3jAIwbM4q7XWzI4OcP1W3zMtpQ/hI/A== X-Received: by 2002:a50:8c24:: with SMTP id p33mr18959170edp.330.1599527289352; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 18:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.25.217.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k6sm16713348ejr.104.2020.09.07.18.08.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Sep 2020 18:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 04:08:06 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Andrew Lunn Cc: kuba@kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: don't print non-fatal MTU error if not supported Message-ID: <20200908010806.innpkij2q7uf6s2p@skbuf> References: <20200907232556.1671828-1-olteanv@gmail.com> <20200908005709.GB3267902@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200908005709.GB3267902@lunn.ch> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 02:57:09AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > Hi Vladimir > > In some ways, this has been good. A lot more DSA drivers now have MTU > support and jumbo packet support. Yes, I suspect this is because many people wanted to experiment with jumbo frames anyway, and the warning in dmesg acted as a sort of reminder that the infrastructure is there. If it weren't for this pre-existing interest, I would have expected a patch that silenced this warning sooner, and not from me (the switches that I have don't print this message). Thanks, -Vladimir