netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
To: <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/8] devlink: Support add and delete devlink port
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:17:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917081731.8363-3-parav@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917081731.8363-1-parav@nvidia.com>

Extended devlink interface for the user to add and delete port.
Extend devlink to connect user requests to driver to add/delete
such port in the device.

When driver routines are invoked, devlink instance lock is not held.
This enables driver to perform several devlink objects registration,
unregistration such as (port, health reporter, resource etc)
by using exising devlink APIs.
This also helps to uniformly used the code for port registration
during driver unload and during port deletion initiated by user.

Examples of add, show and delete commands:
Create a device with ID=10 and one physical port.
$ echo "10 1" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device

$ devlink port show netdevsim/netdevsim10/0
netdevsim/netdevsim10/0: type eth netdev eni10np1 flavour physical port 1 splittable false

$ devlink port add netdevsim/netdevsim10 flavour pcipf pfnum 0

$ devlink port show netdevsim/netdevsim10/1
netdevsim/netdevsim10/1: type eth netdev eni10npf0 flavour pcipf controller 0 pfnum 0 external false splittable false
  function:
    hw_addr 00:00:00:00:00:00 state inactive

$ devlink port show netdevsim/netdevsim10/1 -jp
{
    "port": {
        "netdevsim/netdevsim10/1": {
            "type": "eth",
            "netdev": "eni10npf0",
            "flavour": "pcipf",
            "controller": 0,
            "pfnum": 0,
            "external": false,
            "splittable": false,
            "function": {
                "hw_addr": "00:00:00:00:00:00",
                "state": "inactive"
            }
        }
    }
}

$ devlink port del netdevsim/netdevsim10/1

Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
---
 include/net/devlink.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/core/devlink.c    | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
index 1edb558125b0..ebab2c0360d0 100644
--- a/include/net/devlink.h
+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
@@ -142,6 +142,17 @@ struct devlink_port {
 	struct mutex reporters_lock; /* Protects reporter_list */
 };
 
+struct devlink_port_new_attrs {
+	enum devlink_port_flavour flavour;
+	unsigned int port_index;
+	u32 controller;
+	u32 sfnum;
+	u16 pfnum;
+	u8 port_index_valid:1,
+	   controller_valid:1,
+	   sfnum_valid:1;
+};
+
 struct devlink_sb_pool_info {
 	enum devlink_sb_pool_type pool_type;
 	u32 size;
@@ -1189,6 +1200,33 @@ struct devlink_ops {
 	int (*port_function_hw_addr_set)(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink_port *port,
 					 const u8 *hw_addr, int hw_addr_len,
 					 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+	/**
+	 * @port_new: Port add function.
+	 *
+	 * Should be used by device driver to let caller add new port of a specified flavour
+	 * with optional attributes.
+	 * Driver should return -EOPNOTSUPP if it doesn't support port addition of a specified
+	 * flavour or specified attributes. Driver should set extack error message in case of fail
+	 * to add the port.
+	 * devlink core does not hold a devlink instance lock when this callback is invoked.
+	 * Driver must ensures synchronization when adding or deleting a port. Driver must
+	 * register a port with devlink core.
+	 */
+	int (*port_new)(struct devlink *devlink, const struct devlink_port_new_attrs *attrs,
+			struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+	/**
+	 * @port_del: Port delete function.
+	 *
+	 * Should be used by device driver to let caller delete port which was previously created
+	 * using port_new() callback.
+	 * Driver should return -EOPNOTSUPP if it doesn't support port deletion.
+	 * Driver should set extack error message in case of fail to delete the port.
+	 * devlink core does not hold a devlink instance lock when this callback is invoked.
+	 * Driver must ensures synchronization when adding or deleting a port. Driver must
+	 * register a port with devlink core.
+	 */
+	int (*port_del)(struct devlink *devlink, unsigned int port_index,
+			struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
 };
 
 static inline void *devlink_priv(struct devlink *devlink)
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index fada660fd515..e93730065c57 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -991,6 +991,57 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_port_unsplit_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return devlink_port_unsplit(devlink, port_index, info->extack);
 }
 
+static int devlink_nl_cmd_port_new_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
+{
+	struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = info->extack;
+	struct devlink_port_new_attrs new_attrs = {};
+	struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
+
+	if (!info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FLAVOUR] ||
+	    !info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_PF_NUMBER]) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Port flavour or PCI PF are not specified");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	new_attrs.flavour = nla_get_u16(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FLAVOUR]);
+	new_attrs.pfnum = nla_get_u16(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_PF_NUMBER]);
+
+	if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_INDEX]) {
+		new_attrs.port_index = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_INDEX]);
+		new_attrs.port_index_valid = true;
+	}
+	if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_CONTROLLER_NUMBER]) {
+		new_attrs.controller =
+			nla_get_u16(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_CONTROLLER_NUMBER]);
+		new_attrs.controller_valid = true;
+	}
+	if (info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_SF_NUMBER]) {
+		new_attrs.sfnum = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_SF_NUMBER]);
+		new_attrs.sfnum_valid = true;
+	}
+
+	if (!devlink->ops->port_new)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	return devlink->ops->port_new(devlink, &new_attrs, extack);
+}
+
+static int devlink_nl_cmd_port_del_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
+{
+	struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = info->extack;
+	struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
+	unsigned int port_index;
+
+	if (!info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_INDEX]) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Port index is not specified");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	port_index = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_INDEX]);
+
+	if (!devlink->ops->port_del)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	return devlink->ops->port_del(devlink, port_index, extack);
+}
+
 static int devlink_nl_sb_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
 			      struct devlink_sb *devlink_sb,
 			      enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid,
@@ -7078,6 +7129,10 @@ static const struct nla_policy devlink_nl_policy[DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
 	[DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_POLICER_RATE] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
 	[DEVLINK_ATTR_TRAP_POLICER_BURST] = { .type = NLA_U64 },
 	[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FUNCTION] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
+	[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FLAVOUR] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
+	[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_PF_NUMBER] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
+	[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PCI_SF_NUMBER] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
+	[DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_CONTROLLER_NUMBER] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
 };
 
 static const struct genl_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
@@ -7117,6 +7172,18 @@ static const struct genl_ops devlink_nl_ops[] = {
 		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
 		.internal_flags = DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NO_LOCK,
 	},
+	{
+		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_NEW,
+		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_port_new_doit,
+		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
+		.internal_flags = DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NO_LOCK,
+	},
+	{
+		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_DEL,
+		.doit = devlink_nl_cmd_port_del_doit,
+		.flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
+		.internal_flags = DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NO_LOCK,
+	},
 	{
 		.cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_SB_GET,
 		.validate = GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT | GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP,
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-17  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-17  8:17 [PATCH net-next 0/8] devlink: Add SF add/delete devlink ops Parav Pandit
2020-09-17  8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] devlink: Introduce PCI SF port flavour and port attribute Parav Pandit
2020-09-17  8:17 ` Parav Pandit [this message]
2020-09-17  8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] devlink: Prepare code to fill multiple port function attributes Parav Pandit
2020-09-17  8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] devlink: Support get and set state of port function Parav Pandit
2020-09-17  8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] netdevsim: Add support for add and delete of a PCI PF port Parav Pandit
2020-09-17 11:16   ` [PATCH] netdevsim: fix semicolon.cocci warnings kernel test robot
     [not found]   ` <202009171937.JRIyGgCc%lkp@intel.com>
2020-09-17 13:57     ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] netdevsim: Add support for add and delete of a PCI PF port Parav Pandit
2020-09-17  8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] netdevsim: Simulate get/set hardware address of a PCI port Parav Pandit
2020-09-17  8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] netdevsim: Simulate port function state for " Parav Pandit
2020-09-17 17:20   ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] devlink: Add SF add/delete devlink ops Parav Pandit
2020-09-17 17:20     ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] devlink: Introduce PCI SF port flavour and port attribute Parav Pandit
2020-09-17 20:01       ` David Ahern
2020-09-18  4:18         ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-18 15:15           ` David Ahern
2020-09-18 16:13             ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-19  4:49               ` David Ahern
2020-09-19  5:35                 ` Parav Pandit
     [not found]       ` <fcb55cc1-3be3-3eaa-68d5-28b4d112e291@intel.com>
2020-09-18  3:54         ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-18 23:04           ` Jacob Keller
2020-09-17 17:20     ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] devlink: Support add and delete devlink port Parav Pandit
     [not found]       ` <28cbe5b9-a39e-9299-8c9b-6cce63328f0f@intel.com>
2020-09-18  4:25         ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-18 23:06           ` Jacob Keller
2020-09-19  5:39             ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-17 17:20     ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/8] devlink: Prepare code to fill multiple port function attributes Parav Pandit
     [not found]       ` <0dc57740-48fb-d77f-dcdf-2607ef2dc545@intel.com>
2020-09-18  3:35         ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-18 22:53           ` Jacob Keller
2020-09-19  5:41             ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-17 17:20     ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/8] devlink: Support get and set state of port function Parav Pandit
2020-09-17 20:23       ` David Ahern
2020-09-18  3:30         ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-17 17:20     ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/8] netdevsim: Add support for add and delete of a PCI PF port Parav Pandit
2020-09-17 17:20     ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/8] netdevsim: Simulate get/set hardware address of a PCI port Parav Pandit
2020-09-17 17:20     ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/8] netdevsim: Simulate port function state for " Parav Pandit
2020-09-17 17:20     ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/8] netdevsim: Add support for add and delete PCI SF port Parav Pandit
2020-09-17 20:31       ` David Ahern
2020-09-18  3:29         ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-18  3:38           ` David Ahern
2020-09-18  4:41             ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-18  4:53               ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2020-09-18  5:10                 ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-18 15:23               ` David Ahern
2020-09-18 15:51                 ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-18 16:52     ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] devlink: Add SF add/delete devlink ops Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-18 17:08       ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-18 17:37         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-18 17:47           ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-18 18:28             ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-18 20:09               ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-21 22:02                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-22  4:37                   ` Parav Pandit
2020-09-17  8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] netdevsim: Add support for add and delete PCI SF port Parav Pandit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200917081731.8363-3-parav@nvidia.com \
    --to=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).