From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mkubecek@suse.cz
Cc: jarod@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
j.vosburgh@gmail.com, vfalico@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net,
kuba@kernel.org, tadavis@lbl.gov, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] bonding: rename slave to link where possible
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:51:14 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922.165114.402110655616716896.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922232317.jlbgpsy74q6tbx3a@lion.mk-sys.cz>
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 01:23:17 +0200
> Even if the module parameters are deprecated and extremely inconvenient
> as a mean of bonding configuration, I would say changing their names
> would still count as "breaking the userspace".
I totally agree.
Anything user facing has to be kept around for the deprecation period,
and that includes module parameters.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-22 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-22 13:37 [PATCH net-next 0/5] bonding: rename bond components Jarod Wilson
2020-09-22 13:37 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] bonding: rename struct slave member link to link_state Jarod Wilson
2020-09-22 13:37 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] bonding: rename slave to link where possible Jarod Wilson
2020-09-22 23:23 ` Michal Kubecek
2020-09-22 23:51 ` David Miller [this message]
2020-09-25 11:52 ` Jarod Wilson
2020-09-22 13:37 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] bonding: rename master to aggregator " Jarod Wilson
2020-09-22 13:37 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] bonding: make Kconfig toggle to disable legacy interfaces Jarod Wilson
2020-09-22 22:05 ` Jarod Wilson
2020-09-22 23:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-09-22 23:47 ` Jay Vosburgh
2020-09-23 0:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-09-23 16:44 ` Jarod Wilson
2020-09-24 22:47 ` Jay Vosburgh
2020-09-23 4:13 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-23 4:13 ` [RFC PATCH] bonding: linkdesc can be static kernel test robot
2020-09-23 11:29 ` Jarod Wilson
2020-09-22 13:37 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] bonding: update Documentation for link/aggregator terminology Jarod Wilson
2020-09-22 22:19 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] bonding: rename bond components Jay Vosburgh
2020-09-25 12:13 ` Jarod Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200922.165114.402110655616716896.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
--cc=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tadavis@lbl.gov \
--cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).