Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio-net: ethtool configurable RXCSUM

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:10:56PM +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 1:55 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:45:24AM +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:25 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:39:15AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Allow user configuring RXCSUM separately with ethtool -K,
> > > > > reusing the existing virtnet_set_guest_offloads helper
> > > > > that configures RXCSUM for XDP. This is conditional on
> > > > > VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > > > Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > > > >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > index 21b71148c532..2e3af0b2c281 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ static const unsigned long guest_offloads[] = {
> > > > >                               (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN)  | \
> > > > >                               (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO))
> > > > >
> > > > > +#define GUEST_OFFLOAD_CSUM_MASK (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM)
> > > > > +
> > > > >  struct virtnet_stat_desc {
> > > > >       char desc[ETH_GSTRING_LEN];
> > > > >       size_t offset;
> > > > > @@ -2526,25 +2528,37 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
> > > > >                               netdev_features_t features)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >       struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > > > > -     u64 offloads;
> > > > > +     u64 offloads = vi->guest_offloads &
> > > > > +                    vi->guest_offloads_capable;
> > > > >       int err;
> > > > >
> > > > > -     if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO) {
> > > > > -             if (vi->xdp_queue_pairs)
> > > > > -                     return -EBUSY;
> > > > > +     /* Don't allow configuration while XDP is active. */
> > > > > +     if (vi->xdp_queue_pairs)
> > > > > +             return -EBUSY;
> > > > >
> > > > > +     if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO) {
> > > > >               if (features & NETIF_F_LRO)
> > > > > -                     offloads = vi->guest_offloads_capable;
> > > > > +                     offloads |= GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK;
> > > > >               else
> > > > > -                     offloads = vi->guest_offloads_capable &
> > > > > -                                ~GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK;
> > > > > +                     offloads &= ~GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK;
> > > > > +     }
> > > > >
> > > > > -             err = virtnet_set_guest_offloads(vi, offloads);
> > > > > -             if (err)
> > > > > -                     return err;
> > > > > -             vi->guest_offloads = offloads;
> > > > > +     if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) {
> > > > > +             if (features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
> > > > > +                     offloads |= GUEST_OFFLOAD_CSUM_MASK;
> > > > > +             else
> > > > > +                     offloads &= ~GUEST_OFFLOAD_CSUM_MASK;
> > > > >       }
> > > > >
> > > > > +     if (offloads == (vi->guest_offloads &
> > > > > +                      vi->guest_offloads_capable))
> > > > > +             return 0;
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, what exactly does this do?
> > > If the features(lro, rxcsum) we supported, are not changed, it is not
> > > necessary to invoke virtnet_set_guest_offloads.
> >
> > okay, could you describe the cases where this triggers in a bit more
> > detail pls?
> Hi
> As I known,  when we run che commands show as below:
> ethtool -K eth1 sg off
> ethtool -K eth1 tso off
> 
> In that case, we will not invoke virtnet_set_guest_offloads.

How about initialization though? E.g. it looks like guest_offloads
is 0-initialized, won't this skip the first command to disable
offloads?

> > > > > +
> > > > > +     err = virtnet_set_guest_offloads(vi, offloads);
> > > > > +     if (err)
> > > > > +             return err;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     vi->guest_offloads = offloads;
> > > > >       return 0;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -3013,8 +3027,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > > >       if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
> > > > >           virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6))
> > > > >               dev->features |= NETIF_F_LRO;
> > > > > -     if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS))
> > > > > +     if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS)) {
> > > > > +             dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
> > > > >               dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_LRO;
> > > > > +     }
> > > > >
> > > > >       dev->vlan_features = dev->features;
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.23.0
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards, Tonghao
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards, Tonghao