From: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: modify kthread handler to use __napi_poll()
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:21:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200930192140.4192859-5-weiwan@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200930192140.4192859-1-weiwan@google.com>
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The current kthread handler calls napi_poll() and has to pass a dummy
repoll list to the function, which seems redundent. The new proposed
kthread handler calls the newly proposed __napi_poll(), and respects
napi->weight as before. If repoll is needed, cond_resched() is called
first to give other tasks a chance to run before repolling.
This change is proposed by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> on top of
the previous patch.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index c82522262ca8..b4f33e442b5e 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6827,6 +6827,15 @@ static int __napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, bool *repoll)
gro_normal_list(n);
+ /* Some drivers may have called napi_schedule
+ * prior to exhausting their budget.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!list_empty(&n->poll_list))) {
+ pr_warn_once("%s: Budget exhausted after napi rescheduled\n",
+ n->dev ? n->dev->name : "backlog");
+ return work;
+ }
+
*repoll = true;
return work;
@@ -6847,15 +6856,6 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
if (!do_repoll)
goto out_unlock;
- /* Some drivers may have called napi_schedule
- * prior to exhausting their budget.
- */
- if (unlikely(!list_empty(&n->poll_list))) {
- pr_warn_once("%s: Budget exhausted after napi rescheduled\n",
- n->dev ? n->dev->name : "backlog");
- goto out_unlock;
- }
-
list_add_tail(&n->poll_list, repoll);
out_unlock:
@@ -6884,40 +6884,26 @@ static int napi_thread_wait(struct napi_struct *napi)
static int napi_threaded_poll(void *data)
{
struct napi_struct *napi = data;
+ void *have;
while (!napi_thread_wait(napi)) {
- struct list_head dummy_repoll;
- int budget = netdev_budget;
- unsigned long time_limit;
- bool again = true;
+ for (;;) {
+ bool repoll = false;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dummy_repoll);
- local_bh_disable();
- time_limit = jiffies + 2;
- do {
- /* ensure that the poll list is not empty */
- if (list_empty(&dummy_repoll))
- list_add(&napi->poll_list, &dummy_repoll);
-
- budget -= napi_poll(napi, &dummy_repoll);
- if (unlikely(budget <= 0 ||
- time_after_eq(jiffies, time_limit))) {
- cond_resched();
-
- /* refresh the budget */
- budget = netdev_budget;
- __kfree_skb_flush();
- time_limit = jiffies + 2;
- }
+ local_bh_disable();
- if (napi_disable_pending(napi))
- again = false;
- else if (!test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &napi->state))
- again = false;
- } while (again);
+ have = netpoll_poll_lock(napi);
+ __napi_poll(napi, &repoll);
+ netpoll_poll_unlock(have);
- __kfree_skb_flush();
- local_bh_enable();
+ __kfree_skb_flush();
+ local_bh_enable();
+
+ if (!repoll)
+ break;
+
+ cond_resched();
+ }
}
return 0;
}
--
2.28.0.709.gb0816b6eb0-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-30 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-30 19:21 [PATCH net-next 0/5] implement kthread based napi poll Wei Wang
2020-09-30 19:21 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: implement threaded-able napi poll loop support Wei Wang
2020-09-30 19:21 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: add sysfs attribute to control napi threaded mode Wei Wang
2020-09-30 19:21 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: extract napi poll functionality to __napi_poll() Wei Wang
2020-09-30 19:21 ` Wei Wang [this message]
2020-09-30 19:21 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: improve napi threaded config Wei Wang
2020-10-01 10:01 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-10-01 17:01 ` Wei Wang
2020-10-01 17:11 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-10-01 18:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-10-01 18:37 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-10-01 19:24 ` Wei Wang
2020-10-01 20:48 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-10-01 22:42 ` Wei Wang
2020-09-30 20:08 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] implement kthread based napi poll Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-01 7:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-10-01 20:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-01 22:12 ` Wei Wang
2020-10-01 23:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-02 1:44 ` Wei Wang
2020-10-02 22:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-02 7:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-10-02 22:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-02 23:00 ` David Miller
2020-10-02 23:15 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-10-03 3:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-10-03 4:17 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200930192140.4192859-5-weiwan@google.com \
--to=weiwan@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).