netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	f.fainelli@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, ayal@nvidia.com,
	danieller@nvidia.com, amcohen@nvidia.com, mlxsw@nvidia.com,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] ethtool: Fix incompatibility between netlink and ioctl interfaces
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:06:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200930200653.GC1850258@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200930085917.xr2orisrg3oxw6cw@lion.mk-sys.cz>

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:59:17AM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> How about this compromise? Let's introduce a "legacy" flag which would
> allow "ethtool -s <dev> autoneg on" do what it used to do while we would
> not taint the kernel-userspace API with this special case so that
> ETHTOOL_MSG_LINKMODES_SET request with only ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_AUTONEG
> (but no other attributes like _SPEED or _DUPLEX) would leave advertised
> link modes untouched unless the "legacy" flag is set. If the "legacy"
> flag is set in the request, such request would set advertised modes to
> all supported.

Sorry for the delay, busy with other obligations. Regarding the "legacy"
flag suggestion, do you mean that the ethtool user space utility will
always set it in ETHTOOL_MSG_LINKMODES_SET request in order to maintain
backward compatibility with the ioctl interface?

Thanks for spending time on this issue.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-30 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-29 16:02 [RFC PATCH net] ethtool: Fix incompatibility between netlink and ioctl interfaces Ido Schimmel
2020-09-29 16:44 ` Michal Kubecek
2020-09-30  7:25   ` Ido Schimmel
2020-09-30  8:59     ` Michal Kubecek
2020-09-30 14:19       ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-30 14:35         ` Ido Schimmel
2020-09-30 14:43           ` Ido Schimmel
2020-09-30 20:06       ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2020-09-30 20:45         ` Michal Kubecek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200930200653.GC1850258@shredder \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=amcohen@nvidia.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ayal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=danieller@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
    --cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).