From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F89C4727C for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 06:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A218B20848 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 06:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=nucleusys.com header.i=@nucleusys.com header.b="aJPBcOm8" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730785AbgJAGmn (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 02:42:43 -0400 Received: from lan.nucleusys.com ([92.247.61.126]:60866 "EHLO zztop.nucleusys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725894AbgJAGmm (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 02:42:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nucleusys.com; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=V6RHpntufxYXFGkogn/CnuCRtYCiC7ukQLfufF/rYuw=; b=aJPBcOm8TRpsJ7eFMn4tuP5PPK OoM1hHoUvN9R93Yb7VjQCjZBsQTUZ/Pp3T+oQIqL/fl+qjDtDYUsZlYEnFf55yvL9UpaJx36n22e3 viiAsoVGvwAfRDvWFOLGDhVKd2s1i0+DCv0JyXH6boJHj/RAP+rSRBFOCZO7zrD/FJig=; Received: from [94.26.108.4] (helo=carbon) by zztop.nucleusys.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNsIX-00055v-M5; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 09:42:37 +0300 Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:42:36 +0300 From: Petko Manolov To: Andrew Lunn Cc: David Bilsby , Thor Thayer , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Russell King Subject: Re: Altera TSE driver not working in 100mbps mode Message-ID: <20201001064236.GB8609@carbon> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Lunn , David Bilsby , Thor Thayer , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Russell King References: <20191127135419.7r53qw6vtp747x62@p310> <20191203092918.52x3dfuvnryr5kpx@carbon> <20200917064239.GA40050@p310> <9f312748-1069-4a30-ba3f-d1de6d84e920@virgin.net> <20200918171440.GA1538@p310> <20200930235925.GB3996795@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200930235925.GB3996795@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 20-10-01 01:59:25, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > The subject of this email thread is: > > Altera TSE driver not working in 100mbps mode > > Are you doing your testing at 1G or 100Mbps? I would suggest starting out at > 1G if you can. Well, this is the subject i used some time ago. It is related to a particular issue and, as it turned out, now with the driver but the implementation on the FPGA. Petko