From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03CDC4741F for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 18:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B10B20754 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 18:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="B8+C0j0e" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732673AbgJASdE (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:33:04 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:21448 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730008AbgJASdE (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:33:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601577183; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=A30saAIR3YxcWA7P0bhHO0+t1Ec37MkrDxbuOWUzyS4=; b=B8+C0j0eff70ud9Q4D0DKwDbBx8hUjelzLeSHwb7XI2kaWOd+H90oj6Z4Q8U7KZB5lYJkD KihIQL4KiYDH2XUniHkbWM/cDg7fqXtqfEqQyQrU7dyEMrLpsfky+VZrTOrARKJp4JtSN1 4VHcns7qLflJjjRzS1mFoAsCMttmm5Q= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-408-JH1UqoEbNnayi4bhWm_9qA-1; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 14:30:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: JH1UqoEbNnayi4bhWm_9qA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id j7so2407645wro.14 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 11:30:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=A30saAIR3YxcWA7P0bhHO0+t1Ec37MkrDxbuOWUzyS4=; b=BeLfiEpe2L9If0FUwmKUwH8a03KBn1b8FnoftGxpjtg2ThcmYwqbp1moSqKsOoHZSx 9tSMwJWSx0NrlL8w1CIYr/rOSFD+ONI55m/5uhgc5ks5whVl8p+o0Am2738o9xKAvyF7 mXRfPIy+0w5lBETgJVkkEiDDK9M6275tqlp45NPUBw2nUiCPGhmNpaVAPUjR/5z7f2b8 qLehEQbIs4XCfy9ZRVIs84BbN75Dwi4hrRuocaQhHckJ/cxsu537pbX8wKyVWldoB3Hx cxvX1ROQerC4WuBY/ziYy7qqYjGR4oQP2DkOJlhApScoStgo0U5BkfdOn/XHH8OOQ52j oE8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PcjtBOL5vvCYiL3p8MiyIVqUrug3lPJ4Sh3TMraElXWvJh/Og ujAwvGlmBrzIKFzaBhRKa+0so3l0nqKwFd3NusVyppBNTsaaszZT9NfLp4q2L+z4BRjBcNiFlub hRHNhVCQPYU2dVJD7 X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6055:: with SMTP id u82mr1388395wmb.126.1601577017172; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 11:30:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySc6x6UwskKVwVIo0nAaudFFkQz6xw2Bq9tFSoqIihr7ndt8Hw+olRL6PsBOBxA+bJxjdRHA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6055:: with SMTP id u82mr1388372wmb.126.1601577016916; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 11:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc-2.home (2a01cb058d4f8400c9f0d639f7c74c26.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb05:8d4f:8400:c9f0:d639:f7c7:4c26]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 70sm1251268wmb.41.2020.10.01.11.30.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Oct 2020 11:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 20:30:14 +0200 From: Guillaume Nault To: Tom Parkin Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jchapman@katalix.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] l2tp: add ac/pppoe driver Message-ID: <20201001183014.GC14747@pc-2.home> References: <20200930210707.10717-1-tparkin@katalix.com> <20201001122617.GA9528@pc-2.home> <20201001145728.GA4708@katalix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201001145728.GA4708@katalix.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 03:57:29PM +0100, Tom Parkin wrote: > I'll wait on a little to let any other review comments come in, but > if doing as you suggest is still the preferred approach I'll happily > look at implementing it -- assuming you don't have a patch ready to go? I unfortunately don't. All I saved from my previous ongoing L2TP and PPP work is a (long) TODO list.