Re: [PATCH v4] staging: qlge: fix build breakage with dumping enabled

[Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 02:53:48PM +0900, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
>On 2020-10-03 07:59 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
>> This fixes commit 0107635e15ac
>> ("staging: qlge: replace pr_err with netdev_err") which introduced an
>> build breakage of missing `struct ql_adapter *qdev` for some functions
>> and a warning of type mismatch with dumping enabled, i.e.,
>>
>> $ make CFLAGS_MODULE="-DQL_ALL_DUMP -DQL_OB_DUMP -DQL_CB_DUMP \
>>     -DQL_IB_DUMP -DQL_REG_DUMP -DQL_DEV_DUMP" M=drivers/staging/qlge
>>
>> qlge_dbg.c: In function ‘ql_dump_ob_mac_rsp’:
>> qlge_dbg.c:2051:13: error: ‘qdev’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘cdev’?
>>  2051 |  netdev_err(qdev->ndev, "%s\n", __func__);
>>       |             ^~~~
>> qlge_dbg.c: In function ‘ql_dump_routing_entries’:
>> qlge_dbg.c:1435:10: warning: format ‘%s’ expects argument of type ‘char *’, but argument 3 has type ‘int’ [-Wformat=]
>>  1435 |        "%s: Routing Mask %d = 0x%.08x\n",
>>       |         ~^
>>       |          |
>>       |          char *
>>       |         %d
>>  1436 |        i, value);
>>       |        ~
>>       |        |
>>       |        int
>> qlge_dbg.c:1435:37: warning: format ‘%x’ expects a matching ‘unsigned int’ argument [-Wformat=]
>>  1435 |        "%s: Routing Mask %d = 0x%.08x\n",
>>       |                                 ~~~~^
>>       |                                     |
>>       |                                     unsigned int
>>
>> Note that now ql_dump_rx_ring/ql_dump_tx_ring won't check if the passed
>> parameter is a null pointer.
>>
>> Fixes: 0107635e15ac ("staging: qlge: replace pr_err with netdev_err")
>> Reported-by: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@gmail.com>
>> Suggested-by: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com>
>> ---
>
>Reviewed-by: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@gmail.com>

Thank you! Btw, I guess when this patch is picked, the "Reviewed-by" tag
will also be included. So I needn't to send another patch, am I right?

--
Best regards,
Coiby