From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECA0C47095 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 08:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C43D2075A for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 08:19:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601885993; bh=wSnciMIgpvJBk5a8kvZn784VkeAKOOCVSEidrd8ylms=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=QUpBrtOVul/8c22GKzKA8UTjOkFh/PGejgNtTbHupH7fUe+t8mM2/JX7GAPJ1qI8q h3vcvQpPsxIEsNDT0MiAIm4TQ0Z0GEkZxw1x1T9rMutZ9JQVkkYxELAPQ/AfnUBjfp cSyCJm7zo9jQ4FrCFlCw7LYKAISU4oZyTXkDwLDI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726068AbgJEITv (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 04:19:51 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f67.google.com ([209.85.167.67]:35263 "EHLO mail-lf1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725885AbgJEITu (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 04:19:50 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f67.google.com with SMTP id w11so9803249lfn.2; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 01:19:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Q4XZrXEeQD517Aqzlbe9SxhNn9MS2ME8Yf3Gk4LM/sc=; b=Z0eTS6wkdakt7z8JAuccJ3Bo/6i9KkIAnCR/lVi130QkTevqXszRWzOGBDRIWQeux/ PcImaqDeDYKn7EqqgON0tHwD0SM4XASHx8RIIl67ucQxDCmVTJFGEnut0QdXF85NzoAO Bdq4vwKGXUSjsdLDThF3aQi85uduV8gzzTKP2alGzONOdRLVYw832Zm98R2bTQem/8g5 Ae3l9rKQ866HZMqD3+82ehM4XRhXqEm2S9WlXVvVXUM4MbF9FgR0RY2804OXjo0qAMrv oCI0Hkm5fgqfsKmk3E7jYeVhhe4MiuUeU58t92TETlw4ZIadmWNL/dV4zwFHYNAjKFZH ecFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bMyH95brR8KFs3gDQmQnV5wucIfLMLqLD4SFZJEmkPycfyyjz aIeTiI+UQ3CCjPbwhARM1Gs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzBO+i0G1WlEF/XcGMfyolfNZxzJtOqB8x0vXbXApEAKorWqT2Xqz9AF+kZWMnBtTWOyZs8SQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:31d:: with SMTP id t29mr2351786lfp.327.1601885989265; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 01:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xi.terra (c-beaee455.07-184-6d6c6d4.bbcust.telenor.se. [85.228.174.190]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a28sm264798lfi.60.2020.10.05.01.19.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Oct 2020 01:19:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from johan by xi.terra with local (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from ) id 1kPLii-0001TC-FA; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 10:19:45 +0200 Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:19:44 +0200 From: Johan Hovold To: Wilken Gottwalt Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Johan Hovold , Greg Kroah-Hartman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: serial: qmi_wwan: add Cellient MPL200 card Message-ID: <20201005081944.GK5141@localhost> References: <4688927cbf36fe0027340ea5e0c3aaf1445ba256.1601715478.git.wilken.gottwalt@mailbox.org> <87d01yovq5.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> <20201004203042.093ac473@monster.powergraphx.local> <20201005080612.GI5141@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201005080612.GI5141@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:06:12AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Wilken Gottwalt wrote: > > Oh sorry, looks like I got it mixed up a bit. It was my first attempt to submit > > a patch set. Which is the best way to resubmit an update if the other part of > > the patch set gets accepted? The documentation about re-/submitting patch sets > > is a bit thin. > > Just send these as individual patches (not a series) as they are > independent and go through separate trees. > > Also, I never received the USB serial patch, only this one, so you need > to resend both anyway. Found it flagged spam, so no need to resend that one. Just resend the networking one with a v2 prefix. In general, you could mention in a changelog in the cover letter that you've removed patches that have already been applied. Johan