From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF95C4363D for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 12:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF292078D for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 12:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="bJXCxENK" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726356AbgJEMST (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 08:18:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47310 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725970AbgJEMST (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 08:18:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com (mail-wr1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::442]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1272C0613CE for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 05:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id k10so9298818wru.6 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 05:18:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9bbkLmqsGFegNG0ldfQK4cwI5yP6xy9ZwsyIxzLr2+k=; b=bJXCxENKxN0YjKNjI+Px8XuEUqcna05jHeVL6wlke2M1w0U1mY9dou6HQQycrQ+U4H 9/h4rl3jHWPMirDiREAV6Uu29gGbqIeZOCbYDl952N4lZqlJnBAKturIM5P7yMGzockf 8Hn4K/bn2jVcwIYhjV9I4Jk6cbrGmByt65gaWH470kB8ZPR7XydudT+SkeUeMOEIzTQ9 ynKd4ypjvtP3Eg1eW3u8HZk0MTg4qiOuwo4zDZ+jJ8M9rBi4+mIgyMDPX1vwDtsnEyY5 MA41Ve2cNZ7psS9U9clPzQPTXRBglPbNxNOgOfrbnFcZoMs04yCW2AsiuVCmupqOKf3R WHOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9bbkLmqsGFegNG0ldfQK4cwI5yP6xy9ZwsyIxzLr2+k=; b=cny1TSEvYZ2FkdkkPne3wxwRKcNzUcYVgab28r+beTqAKFxMKMazQRvNlwp+5jclQU YbYnc0lv6OPrSHzXVdaIz8Unuv7gIMuHlT68S/w8hYUW/Nt47Zt8qfYH4lHBzyfYmD1S 9puH5HixPwvQ7aTh5BDK/H6FnbdiHmhZ9m3nLvkQdnP1VFCpYluozMukdHT+H21lfGPp m3vue8JGO/TbMN7/v+VQAIAyvN8Q+os5s+pMaMfj89Ha8KPOtMtZoXhvmqvos1OWYAUK rLB3FzZ6cDB2xnWpuHORlZxxrLkEP7Na/eKjupUrhit+uBBP9Q5Z2uR3HCAHlSypu64i dvdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+YJYH8mgxDXemxZW9TMv4WseuYDqVuuY5iVzLEsHK5IESoLX7 9Iow6dlyI2fdNagta98NwFT/Og== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3Vtfk3XyAkY9PZHloMzZiAILa1njNOCS+o8g5KjjLlnecQ0zriR9i8lPY2GbFfvPaA8NoDw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6886:: with SMTP id h6mr18021616wru.374.1601900297402; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 05:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([85.163.43.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u15sm12143712wml.21.2020.10.05.05.18.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Oct 2020 05:18:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:18:13 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko To: Moshe Shemesh Cc: Moshe Shemesh , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jiri Pirko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 03/16] devlink: Add devlink reload limit option Message-ID: <20201005121813.GA6617@nanopsycho> References: <1601560759-11030-1-git-send-email-moshe@mellanox.com> <1601560759-11030-4-git-send-email-moshe@mellanox.com> <20201003075100.GC3159@nanopsycho.orion> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 08:42:47AM CEST, moshe@nvidia.com wrote: > >On 10/3/2020 10:51 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 03:59:06PM CEST, moshe@mellanox.com wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> > enum devlink_attr { >> > /* don't change the order or add anything between, this is ABI! */ >> > DEVLINK_ATTR_UNSPEC, >> > @@ -507,6 +524,7 @@ enum devlink_attr { >> > >> > DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTION, /* u8 */ >> > DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_ACTIONS_PERFORMED, /* u64 */ >> > + DEVLINK_ATTR_RELOAD_LIMIT, /* u8 */ >> Hmm, why there could be specified only single "limit"? I believe this >> should be a bitfield. Same for the internal api to the driver. > > >Why bitfield ? Either the user asks for a specific limit or he doesn't ask >for any (unspecified). He can ask for multiple limits: No_link_flag , no_something_else. Could be totally unrelated limitations. Let's just have the UAPI ready for this once we define it from scratch. > >If the user doesn't need limitation he will not specify a limit. > >> [...]