From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
maze@google.com, lmb@cloudflare.com, shaun@tigera.io,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
marek@cloudflare.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
eyal.birger@gmail.com, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V2 5/6] bpf: Add MTU check for TC-BPF packets after egress hook
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 10:30:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201008103034.55c1b8bb@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7aeb6082-48a3-9b71-2e2c-10adeb5ee79a@iogearbox.net>
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:37:00 +0200
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> On 10/7/20 6:23 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> [...]
> > net/core/dev.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index b433098896b2..19406013f93e 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -3870,6 +3870,7 @@ sch_handle_egress(struct sk_buff *skb, int *ret, struct net_device *dev)
> > switch (tcf_classify(skb, miniq->filter_list, &cl_res, false)) {
> > case TC_ACT_OK:
> > case TC_ACT_RECLASSIFY:
> > + *ret = NET_XMIT_SUCCESS;
> > skb->tc_index = TC_H_MIN(cl_res.classid);
> > break;
> > case TC_ACT_SHOT:
> > @@ -4064,9 +4065,12 @@ static int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
> > {
> > struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
> > struct netdev_queue *txq;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> > + bool mtu_check = false;
> > +#endif
> > + bool again = false;
> > struct Qdisc *q;
> > int rc = -ENOMEM;
> > - bool again = false;
> >
> > skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> >
> > @@ -4082,14 +4086,28 @@ static int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
> >
> > qdisc_pkt_len_init(skb);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> > + mtu_check = skb_is_redirected(skb);
> > skb->tc_at_ingress = 0;
> > # ifdef CONFIG_NET_EGRESS
> > if (static_branch_unlikely(&egress_needed_key)) {
> > + unsigned int len_orig = skb->len;
> > +
> > skb = sch_handle_egress(skb, &rc, dev);
> > if (!skb)
> > goto out;
> > + /* BPF-prog ran and could have changed packet size beyond MTU */
> > + if (rc == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS && skb->len > len_orig)
> > + mtu_check = true;
> > }
> > # endif
> > + /* MTU-check only happens on "last" net_device in a redirect sequence
> > + * (e.g. above sch_handle_egress can steal SKB and skb_do_redirect it
> > + * either ingress or egress to another device).
> > + */
>
> Hmm, quite some overhead in fast path.
Not really, normal fast-path already call is_skb_forwardable(). And it
already happens in existing code, ingress redirect code, which I remove
calling in patch 6.
(I have considered inlining is_skb_forwardable as a optimization for
general netstack dev_forward_skb)
> Also, won't this be checked multiple times on stacked devices? :(
I don't think it will be checked multiple times, because we have a
skb_reset_redirect() in ingress path (just after sch_handle_ingress()).
> Moreover, this missed the fact that 'real' qdiscs can have
> filters attached too, this would come after this check. Can't this instead be in
> driver layer for those that really need it? I would probably only drop the check
> as done in 1/6 and allow the BPF prog to do the validation if needed.
See other reply, this is likely what we will end-up with.
> > + if (mtu_check && !is_skb_forwardable(dev, skb)) {
> > + rc = -EMSGSIZE;
> > + goto drop;
> > + }
> > #endif
> > /* If device/qdisc don't need skb->dst, release it right now while
> > * its hot in this cpu cache.
> > @@ -4157,7 +4175,9 @@ static int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
> >
> > rc = -ENETDOWN;
> > rcu_read_unlock_bh();
> > -
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> > +drop:
> > +#endif
> > atomic_long_inc(&dev->tx_dropped);
> > kfree_skb_list(skb);
> > return rc;
> >
>
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-08 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-07 16:22 [PATCH bpf-next V2 0/6] bpf: New approach for BPF MTU handling and enforcement Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 1/6] bpf: Remove MTU check in __bpf_skb_max_len Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 21:26 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-10-07 23:46 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2020-10-08 11:06 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-08 12:33 ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-10-08 14:07 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 2/6] bpf: bpf_fib_lookup return MTU value as output when looked up Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 3/6] bpf: add BPF-helper for MTU checking Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 4/6] bpf: make it possible to identify BPF redirected SKBs Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 5/6] bpf: Add MTU check for TC-BPF packets after egress hook Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 21:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-10-07 22:36 ` John Fastabend
2020-10-07 23:52 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2020-10-08 3:19 ` John Fastabend
2020-10-08 8:07 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-08 8:25 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-10-08 8:30 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2020-10-07 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 6/6] bpf: drop MTU check when doing TC-BPF redirect to ingress Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201008103034.55c1b8bb@carbon \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=marek@cloudflare.com \
--cc=maze@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaun@tigera.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).