netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	maze@google.com, lmb@cloudflare.com, shaun@tigera.io,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	marek@cloudflare.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	eyal.birger@gmail.com, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V2 5/6] bpf: Add MTU check for TC-BPF packets after egress hook
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 10:30:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201008103034.55c1b8bb@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7aeb6082-48a3-9b71-2e2c-10adeb5ee79a@iogearbox.net>

On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:37:00 +0200
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:

> On 10/7/20 6:23 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> [...]
> >   net/core/dev.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index b433098896b2..19406013f93e 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -3870,6 +3870,7 @@ sch_handle_egress(struct sk_buff *skb, int *ret, struct net_device *dev)
> >   	switch (tcf_classify(skb, miniq->filter_list, &cl_res, false)) {
> >   	case TC_ACT_OK:
> >   	case TC_ACT_RECLASSIFY:
> > +		*ret = NET_XMIT_SUCCESS;
> >   		skb->tc_index = TC_H_MIN(cl_res.classid);
> >   		break;
> >   	case TC_ACT_SHOT:
> > @@ -4064,9 +4065,12 @@ static int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
> >   {
> >   	struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
> >   	struct netdev_queue *txq;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> > +	bool mtu_check = false;
> > +#endif
> > +	bool again = false;
> >   	struct Qdisc *q;
> >   	int rc = -ENOMEM;
> > -	bool again = false;
> >   
> >   	skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> >   
> > @@ -4082,14 +4086,28 @@ static int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
> >   
> >   	qdisc_pkt_len_init(skb);
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> > +	mtu_check = skb_is_redirected(skb);
> >   	skb->tc_at_ingress = 0;
> >   # ifdef CONFIG_NET_EGRESS
> >   	if (static_branch_unlikely(&egress_needed_key)) {
> > +		unsigned int len_orig = skb->len;
> > +
> >   		skb = sch_handle_egress(skb, &rc, dev);
> >   		if (!skb)
> >   			goto out;
> > +		/* BPF-prog ran and could have changed packet size beyond MTU */
> > +		if (rc == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS && skb->len > len_orig)
> > +			mtu_check = true;
> >   	}
> >   # endif
> > +	/* MTU-check only happens on "last" net_device in a redirect sequence
> > +	 * (e.g. above sch_handle_egress can steal SKB and skb_do_redirect it
> > +	 * either ingress or egress to another device).
> > +	 */  
> 
> Hmm, quite some overhead in fast path. 

Not really, normal fast-path already call is_skb_forwardable(). And it
already happens in existing code, ingress redirect code, which I remove
calling in patch 6.

(I have considered inlining is_skb_forwardable as a optimization for
general netstack dev_forward_skb)

> Also, won't this be checked multiple times on stacked devices? :(

I don't think it will be checked multiple times, because we have a
skb_reset_redirect() in ingress path (just after sch_handle_ingress()).

> Moreover, this missed the fact that 'real' qdiscs can have
> filters attached too, this would come after this check. Can't this instead be in
> driver layer for those that really need it? I would probably only drop the check
> as done in 1/6 and allow the BPF prog to do the validation if needed.

See other reply, this is likely what we will end-up with.

> > +	if (mtu_check && !is_skb_forwardable(dev, skb)) {
> > +		rc = -EMSGSIZE;
> > +		goto drop;
> > +	}
> >   #endif
> >   	/* If device/qdisc don't need skb->dst, release it right now while
> >   	 * its hot in this cpu cache.
> > @@ -4157,7 +4175,9 @@ static int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
> >   
> >   	rc = -ENETDOWN;
> >   	rcu_read_unlock_bh();
> > -
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> > +drop:
> > +#endif
> >   	atomic_long_inc(&dev->tx_dropped);
> >   	kfree_skb_list(skb);
> >   	return rc;
> >   
> 



-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-08  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-07 16:22 [PATCH bpf-next V2 0/6] bpf: New approach for BPF MTU handling and enforcement Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 1/6] bpf: Remove MTU check in __bpf_skb_max_len Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 21:26   ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-10-07 23:46   ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2020-10-08 11:06     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-08 12:33       ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-10-08 14:07         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 2/6] bpf: bpf_fib_lookup return MTU value as output when looked up Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 3/6] bpf: add BPF-helper for MTU checking Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 4/6] bpf: make it possible to identify BPF redirected SKBs Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 5/6] bpf: Add MTU check for TC-BPF packets after egress hook Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 21:37   ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-10-07 22:36     ` John Fastabend
2020-10-07 23:52       ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2020-10-08  3:19         ` John Fastabend
2020-10-08  8:07           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-08  8:25             ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-10-08  8:30     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2020-10-07 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 6/6] bpf: drop MTU check when doing TC-BPF redirect to ingress Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201008103034.55c1b8bb@carbon \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=marek@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=maze@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaun@tigera.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).