From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234EAC43457 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B716A22283 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="meF9JUfF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727199AbgJSMiJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:38:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52406 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726336AbgJSMiH (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:38:07 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd44.google.com (mail-io1-xd44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d44]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 462CCC0613CE for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 05:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd44.google.com with SMTP id k21so12680850ioa.9 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 05:38:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=suWzC+GD3r7pieoIsN/5CBQnApuR/UOsCj7nxJ1ikTM=; b=meF9JUfFHpSw3d3WAXFY/WZvc9IYs2hDJR73mxvTvUn//ety26lLQ2NWodRDer0sjt 3Uw0bLqXKgX9LJiQxzR2gmCBLpxBQt/X5ptmv2sUjjybdDuEyL+vBhy//TWQDmeo0/8J oJhnvuetY9spmu6CklG4rA2vDVjpNY5hsakJ9pnWpgW0rtHobrh7szZTIbtDkhsx13cU yA8oAfIv5qTpxPHZpojROJyzjMv0X+E1wle9MFAqwbKiXaM3YwwUFAby/tq6/fEJJBRv VPhSw4fXu5U0zlOcc2126ywkVyyUyAhlgL7o1LVjR5ec58/wEWu0GCOcEVoHY6zKtDL5 1/ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=suWzC+GD3r7pieoIsN/5CBQnApuR/UOsCj7nxJ1ikTM=; b=Y6dLvkaVWhWrVmoKr4wU0Dw6kJrhGG4I+TBXOPmoE4MZ0SrrVIPR0I0LnRX/Dg+CCh 0AUHk71axNfYflE+5o/Y+a90JMGyGdrZf5rrpoMXmk1zeiR0mhIuQp49SIXGL5NGamZT X6G6o5rLMaRmb+BUaFanxOiH/bncTYHHmyKF+mXqbAigR9RuIEd6P2x6F1wMWeADeNFz 0MZmvJEC2qRXu38hUIzxMl9LBtkrNkb4NrJXib3n8afd7okXkkELhhd7eTby96wWuQK1 p9+bLpqSSkc8SzPu6PHj1ItIS3G7ViX0KSHmH8B63WdlISmUOVlu3ynL+OvWpyjI7N3r kzmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5309ChM4HzjBA3dy+hY/Y87b2WvN99Onky3x8VKGt4l+llPWkNLr Ov2dIBsyoOpMzECkPMCTqg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzj/r4KFeX32K/KqeHihdv87U4ZYT/3KlfCRb4Zm7qetAqVe5NlXobBNq0tTJ7Duzn94yfiRw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9842:: with SMTP id p2mr10632550ios.113.1603111086683; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 05:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ICIPI.localdomain ([136.56.89.69]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm3054929ilc.15.2020.10.19.05.38.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 05:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:38:04 -0400 From: Stephen Suryaputra To: Mike Manning Cc: David Ahern , netdev@vger.kernel.org, sashal@kernel.org Subject: Re: Why revert commit 2271c95 ("vrf: mark skb for multicast or link-local as enslaved to VRF")? Message-ID: <20201019123804.GD11729@ICIPI.localdomain> References: <20201018132436.GA11729@ICIPI.localdomain> <75fda8c7-adf3-06a4-298f-b75ac6e6969b@gmail.com> <20201018160624.GB11729@ICIPI.localdomain> <33c7f9b3-aec6-6327-53b3-3b54f74ddcf6@gmail.com> <544357d4-1481-8563-323a-addf8b89d9e4@vyatta.att-mail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 01:24:26PM +0100, Mike Manning wrote: > To clarify, the regression in 4.14 only occurred when the commit was > used in isolation, not when applied with the rest of the series. > > It may be worth mentioning that we had been extensively using the series > in our local fork with 4.14 & 4.19 kernels before proceeding with > submitting the series and then switching to 5.x kernel, so that may be > an approach you can take. > Thanks Mike and David. Yes, I think it's best to use it in our local 4.14 fork. Regards, Stephen.