From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2AEC55179 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912F32465A for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="TAYvai1a" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S463195AbgJWLpM (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 07:45:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60348 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S463142AbgJWLpL (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 07:45:11 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1ADCC0613CE; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 04:45:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6lSi9hSUneOKjKoOEI0EQ2kdi/7mfSkeNSqSK8XtkC4=; b=TAYvai1aLUZRqLMGogUsG9bxJ Bg3N5E37TNGkH8pn1Lgko3IhgYJ4Jyj7G621KOm4uV/NR7gSpBRwXlNf2S7pmJrkLh4+rO26e7JLn CELHyb4EyxC5D6TBYdU0ZnLcSkbUGOSt/iEzplsp+7rUeCTJlaeVZANF7KW5oKx5tuHbJYR9fO7by LpsWJrFO4MpjPjIF20JxEMTUX+Bc1wzcQO1KKYG//6mmZAY7ut0QTTHBT17WBiFRk8Jq3Bp4An5/g wB2R7dBtggbb7imRg/tC2rwuFbWIoSC8/BWuIUyPaug3eVkLUPmFYxCJlF882zHEFTINHaXmCH9KM kZVQ58AiA==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:49952) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kVvVI-0003Ni-Fu; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:45:04 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kVvVG-0008Q5-DT; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:45:02 +0100 Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:45:02 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Jakub Kicinski , Oliver Hartkopp , David Jander , kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mkl@pengutronix.de, Marek Vasut , linux-can@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/6] add initial CAN PHY support Message-ID: <20201023114502.GC1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20201023105626.6534-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201023105626.6534-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:56:20PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > - The upcoming CAN SIC and CAN SIC XL PHYs use a different interface to > the CAN controller. This means the controller needs to know which type > of PHY is attached to configure the interface in the correct mode. Use > PHY link for that, too. Is this dynamic in some form? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!