netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Cc: Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@huawei.com>,
	Yonglong Liu <liuyonglong@huawei.com>,
	Yufeng Mo <moyufeng@huawei.com>,
	Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>,
	Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@huawei.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: hns3: clean up a return in hclge_tm_bp_setup()
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:52:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201026065235.GG18329@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fbcbfbd-deea-162e-9281-29e65b90996b@huawei.com>

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:18:16AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> On 2020/10/23 19:22, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Smatch complains that "ret" might be uninitialized if we don't enter
> > the loop.  We do always enter the loop so it's a false positive, but
> > it's cleaner to just return a literal zero and that silences the
> > warning as well.
> 
> Thanks for the clean up. Minor comment below:
> Perhap it makes sense to limit ret scope within the for loop after
> returning zero.
> 

It's not really normal to limit ret scope...  I think it's better to
leave it as-is.

regards,
dan carpenter


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-26  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-23 11:22 [PATCH net] net: hns3: clean up a return in hclge_tm_bp_setup() Dan Carpenter
2020-10-26  3:18 ` Yunsheng Lin
2020-10-26  6:52   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2020-10-26 23:17 ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201026065235.GG18329@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=huangguangbin2@huawei.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=moyufeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com \
    --cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
    --cc=tanhuazhong@huawei.com \
    --cc=yisen.zhuang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).