Re: [PATCH net-next] net: 9p: Fix kerneldoc warnings of missing parameters etc

[Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>]

Andrew Lunn wrote on Sun, Nov 01, 2020:
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

Acked-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>

> > 
> > Thanks, LGTM I'll take this for next cycle unless someone is grabbing
> > these
> 
> I hope to turn on W=1 by default soon in most of /net. That patch is
> likely to go to net-next.

That would be nice!

> What route do your patches normally take to Linus? Do you send a pull
> request to net-next? Or straight to Linus?

I normally send pull requests straight to Linus (because I also have
fs/9p which isn't part of net/) ; but since it's really low volume I
don't like bugging him everytime for such churn and am not really sure
what to do -- that's why I asked :)

> If this patch is not in net-next, i cannot enable it for 9p. So
> either:
> [...]
> 4) Jakub takes this patch into net-next, and i can then enable W=1 in
>    9p along with all the other sub-directories. We will get to know
>    about new warnings in net-next, and next, but not in your tree.

Developers should use next for development anyway; I think that's the
easiest way forward if you want to enable W=1 ASAP.

I mean, if I take the patch the fixes will get in next in the next few
days sure but it'll make enabling W=1 difficult for the net-next tree
without it.
I've added Jakub to direct recipients, could you take this one?


Thanks,
-- 
Dominique